Pramod M Dugad, Pune V. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax,

ITA 554/PUN/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 125 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0049 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 4 month(s) 20 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 17-09-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 30-07-2018
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 27-04-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MRS SHWETA MISHRA

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, PUN E . , , ! ' , # $ BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM AND SHRI VIKAS AW ASTHY, JM . / ITA NO. 554/PUN/2015 #& ' (' / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12 PRAMOD M DUGAD, 28, VASANT BAUG, BIBWEWADI, PUNE-411 037 PAN : AAIPD4558L ....... / APPELLANT & / V/S. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2(1), PUNE. / RESPONDENT ASSESSEE BY : SHRI NIKHIL PATHAK & SHRI SUHAS P BORA REVENUE BY : MRS. SHWETA MISHRA / DATE OF HEARING : 17.09.2018 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 17.09.2018 ) / ORDER PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER O F COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-12, PUNE DATED 24.02.2 015 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12. 2 ITA NO. 554/PUN/2015 A.Y.2011-12 2. SHRI NIKHIL PATHAK APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE H AS FILED REQUEST LETTER DATED 17-09-2018 FROM THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. 3. MRS. SHWETA MISHRA REPRESENTING THE DEPARTMENT STAT ED THAT THE REVENUE HAS NO OBJECTION, IF ASSESSEE WISHES TO WITHDRAW THE APPE AL. 4. BOTH SIDES HEARD. THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED LETTER DATED 17-09-2018 TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. THE SAME IS REPRODUCED HERE-IN-BELOW: 1. THE APPELLANT HAS FILED AN APPEAL FOR THE A.Y.20 11-12 BEARING ITA NO.554/PN/2015 AND THE SAME IS FIXED FOR HEARIN G TODAY. 2. THE APPELLANT DOES NOT WISH TO PURSUE THE LITIGA TION AND THEREFORE WOULD LIKE TO WITHDRAW THE SAID APPEAL. 3. IT IS THEREFORE REQUESTED THAT APPELLANT SHOULD BE GIVEN PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE SAID APPEAL. WITH SINCERE APOLOGIES FOR THE INCONVENIENCE CAUSED . IN VIEW OF ABOVE REQUEST BY THE ASSESSEE, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 5. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON MONDAY, THE 17 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018. SD/- SD/- ( . / D. KARUNAKARA RAO ) ( ! ' /VIKAS AWASTHY) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER / JUDICIAL MEMBER / PUNE; !' / DATED : 17 TH SEPTEMBER, 2018 SB 3 ITA NO. 554/PUN/2015 A.Y.2011-12 ) * +#,-! .!(, / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT. 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT (APPEALS)-12, PUNE. 4. THE CIT, CENTRAL PUNE. 5. %&' () , * () , +,- , / DR, ITAT, B BENCH, PUNE. 6. './ 01 / GUARD FILE. // TRUE COPY // *2 / BY ORDER, 3 (- / PRIVATE SECRETARY * () , / ITAT, PUNE.