Shri Ravindra Kumar Jangir, Sikar, J-16, M/s MGb & Co. LLP, Lal Kothi Yojana, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur, Sikar V. ITO Ward-2, Sikar, Ward-2, Sikar

ITA 556/JPR/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 104 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7152 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 7 month(s) 12 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 30-11-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2015-2016
• Appeal Filed On: 17-04-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

vk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj.k] t;iqj U;k;ihB] t;iqj IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES “B”, JAIPUR Jh ,u-ds-lSuh] mik/;{k ,oa Jh lanhi x®lkÃa] U;kf;d lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 556/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2015-16 Shri Ravindra Kumar Jangir, J-16, M/s MGB & Co. LLP, Lal Kothi Yojana, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur. cuke Vs. I.T.O. Ward-2, Sikar. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ABPPJ 3830 P vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by :Smt. Monisha Choudhary (JCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri Ravindra Kumar Jangir (Self) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 01/12/2021 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@ Date of Pronouncement : 01/12/2021 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dt. 22/02/2019 of the Ld. CIT(A)-3, Jaipur. 2. In the present case, the assessee himself has furnished an application for withdrawal of this appeal stating therein as under: “Sub: For withdrawal of ITA No. 556/JP/2019 dated 18/04/2019. Ref: PAN No. ABPPJ3830P Asst. Yr. 2015-16 Sir, We had been served upon for CIT(A)-3, jaipur on dated 22, Feb 2019. In the above said matter it is hereby submitted that the assessee has ITA 556/JP/2019_ Sh. Ravindra Kr. Jangir Vs ITO 2 preferred appeal on dated 18/04/2019 against order passed by CIT(Appeals), Jaipur. We had filed an appeal in Form No. 36 at Tribunal on dated 18/04/2019 so I further submitted that 1. I had filled the form 1 u/s 4(1) of the VSV Act 2020 alongwith Form 2 i.e. undertaking u/s 4(5) of the VSV Act, 2020 to avail the benefit of Direct Tax Vivad SE Vishwas Act, 2020. 2. That I had electronically verified Form 1 & Form 2 on 02 Feb, 2021. 3. That I had been served with Form 3 Sec under 5(1) of VSV Act, 2020 on dated 24 September 2021 from designated Authority. I therefore request to designated authority permit me to withdrawal of appeal as required to fill Form 4 and pay the determined amount as specified in the certificate i.e. Form 3. Thanking you. Yours faithfully Sd/- Ravindra Kumar Jangir.” 3. During the course of hearing the Assessee himself submitted that since the assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e. Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has issued Form No. 3 bearing Certificate N O. 572971861240921 in response to the application filed by the assessee, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeal of the assessee may be allowed to be withdrawn. 4. The Ld. DR did not object if appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. ITA 556/JP/2019_ Sh. Ravindra Kr. Jangir Vs ITO 3 5. In view of the above the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed. (Order pronounced in the open court on 01/12/2021) Sd/- Sd/- ¼lanhi x®lkÃa½ ¼,u-ds-lSuh½ (SANDEEP GOSAIN) (N.K. SAINI) U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member mik/;{k@Vice President Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 01/12/2021 *Ranjan vkns'k dh izfrfyfi vxzsf’kr@Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- Shri Ravindra Kumar Jangir, Jaipur. 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The I.T.O., Ward-2, Sikar. 3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 4. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The CIT(A) 5. foHkkxh; izfrfuf/k] vk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj.k] t;iqj@DR, ITAT, Jaipur 6. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 556/JP/2019) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order, lgk;d iathdkj@Asst. Registrar