Bowring Institute, Bangalore V. DCIT, Bangalore

ITA 56/BANG/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2010] 136 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5296 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 28 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 17-05-2010
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2002-2003
• Appeal Filed On: 20-01-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: JACINTA ZIMIK VASHAI

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NOS.54 TO 60/BANG/2010 ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2000-01 TO 2006-07 BOWRING INSTITUTE, NO.19, ST. MARKS ROAD BANGALORE 560 001. : APPELLANT VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), BANGALORE. : RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SMT. JACINTA ZIMIK VASHAI O R D E R PER BENCH THESE APPEALS ARE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(APPEALS)-I, BANGALORE DATED 5.10.2009 FOR THE A SSESSMENT YEARS 2000- 01 TO 2006-07. 2. THE APPEALS CAME UP FOR HEARING ON 17.05.10, HOW EVER, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR WAS ANY LETT ER FILED SEEKING ADJOURNMENT. WE FIND FROM THE RECORDS THAT NOTICE HAD BEEN SERVED ON THE ASSESSEE BY RPAD AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD RECEIVED. FROM THE CONDUCT OF THE ASSESSEE, IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESS EE IS NOT INTERESTED IN ITA NO.54 TO 60/BANG/10 PAGE 2 OF 2 PROSECUTING THE APPEALS. THEREFORE, APPLYING THE R ATIO IN THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH TRIBUNAL VIZ., MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. 3 8 ITD 320 (DEL), WE DISMISS THE APPEALS IN LIMINE FOR NON-PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 17 TH DAY OF MAY, 2010. SD/- SD/- ( SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI ) (A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER BANGALORE, DATED, THE 17 TH MAY, 2010. DS/- COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, BANGALORE. 6. GUARD FILE (1+1) BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, BANGALORE.