IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: A NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R. S. SYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT SUCHITRA KAMBLE , JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A .NO.- 5620/DEL/2013 (ASSESSMENT YEA R-2009-10) BHAGWAN DASS OPP. MEENAKSHI INDUSTRIES, JAURASI ROAD, SAMALKHA PANIPAT PAN NO. AFDPD3453J (APPELLANT) VS ITO, WARD-4, PANIPAT (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SH. S. K. JAIN, SR. DR ORDER PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE OR DER DATED 03/06/2013 PASSED BY CIT(A), KARNAL FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-1 0. DESPITE SENDING NOTICE OF HEARING SUFFICIENTLY IN ADVANCE, NEITHER ASSESSE E ATTENDED NOR ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED. IT I S THUS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PROSECUTE THIS APPEAL . 2. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF INCOME TAX APPELL ATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND FOLLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE T RIBUNAL INCLUDING THAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. [38 ITD 320 (DELHI)] AND HONB LE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH DATE OF HEARING 04.08.2016 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 08.08.2016 COURTS DECISION IN CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRA O HOLKAR VS. CWT [223 ITR 480 (MP)], THIS APPEAL IS TREATED AS UN-ADMITTED AN D DISMISSED. 3. IN RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE STANDS DI SMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. THE ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 08TH OF AUGUST, 2016. SD/- SD/- (R.S. SYAL) (SUCHITRA KAMBLE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 08/08/2016 R. NAHEED* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT R EGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI DATE 1. DRAFT DICTATED ON 05.08.2016 PS 2. DRAFT PLACED BEFORE AUTHOR 05.08.2016 PS 3. DRAFT PROPOSED & PLACED BEFORE THE SECOND MEMBER .2016 JM/AM 4. DRAFT DISCUSSED/APPROVED BY SECOND MEMBER. JM/AM 5. APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE PS/PS SR.PS/PS 08 .08.2016 6. KEPT FOR PRONOUNCEMENT ON PS 7. FILE SENT TO THE BENCH CLERK 08.08.2016 PS 8. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE AR 9. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK. 10. DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER.