MR. ANWAR ABDULLA MANSOORI, MUMBAI V. ADDL. C.I.T.,RANGE 18(3), MUMBAI

ITA 5625/MUM/2008

• Counselvise Citation: [2010] 135 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3765 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 2 month(s) 4 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 10-11-2010
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Next Hearing Date: 04-11-2010
• Assessment Year: 2003-2004
• Appeal Filed On: 05-09-2008
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

I.T.A NO.5625/ MUM/2008 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2003-04 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, G BENCH, MUMBAI. BEFORE SHRI D.K.AGARWAL (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR(ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) I.T.A NO.5625/ MUM/2008 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2003-04 ANWAR ABDULLA MANSOORI, .. APPELLANT C-501, GREEN LAWNS, L.J.ROAD, MAHIM(W), MUMBAI-400 016 PA NO.AACPM 4363N VS ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,. RESPO NDEN T RANGE 18(3), MUMBAI. APPELLANT BY: NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI MANVENDRA GOYAL O R D E R PER PRAMOD KUMAR: 1. THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AND IS D IRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27 TH MAY, 2008 PASSED BY THE CIT(A)-XXVIII, MUMBAI IN TH E MATTER OF ASSESSMENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, FOR THE ASSESSM ENT YEAR 2003-04. 2. THE HEARING IN THIS CASE WAS LAST FIXED ON 2.2.2 010 AND AT THE REQUEST OF ASSESSEES COUNSEL VIDE LETTER DATED 2.2.2010, THE HEARING WAS ADJOURNED TO 23.3.2010. HOWEVER, AS THE BENCH DID NOT FUNCTION ON 23.3.2010 AND ALSO ON OTHER THREE OCCASIONS, THE HEARING WAS FINALLY FIXED ON 4.11.2010 AND PARTIES WERE INFORME D THROUGH NOTICE BOARD. I.T.A NO.5625/ MUM/2008 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2003-04 2 3. WHEN THE CASE WAS CALLED ON FOR HEARING ON 4.11. 2010, NO ONE WAS PRESENT FROM THE SIDE OF THE ASSESSEE NOR WAS ANY APPLICATION FOR AD JOURNMENT FILED. FROM THE ABOVE, IT APPEARS THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUT ING THE APPEAL FOR THE REASONS BEST KNOWN TO IT. THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE TR IBUNAL IN THE CASE OF M/S. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI), THE APPEAL OF THE AS SESSEE IS DISMISSED. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL STANDS DISMISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 10 TH NOVEMBER, 2010 SD/- (D.K.AGARWAL) (JUDICIAL MEMBER) SD/- (PRAMOD KUMAR) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) MUMBAI, DATED 10 TH NOVEMBER , 2010 PARIDA COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-XXVIII, MU MBAI 4. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CITY -18, MUMBAI 5. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, BENCH G, MUMBAI //TRUE COPY// BY ORDER ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI