PAGE 1 OF 3 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH SMC-3: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 5630/DEL/2014 A.Y. : 2009-10 NIHAL SINGH DHARIWAL, VS. ITO, WARD-1(1), GURGAON SHOP NO. 5-6, COURT ROAD, PANCHAYAT BHAWAN, GURGAON (PAN: AFDPD3991H) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY : SH. KK JAISWAL, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING : 13-06-2016 DATE OF ORDER : 13-06-2016 O R D E R PER H.S. SIDHU, JM THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED A GAINST THE ORDER DATED 14.8.2014 OF THE LD. CIT(A)-2, FARIDABAD RE LEVANT TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. 2. IN THIS CASE THE NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSE E FOR HEARING BY REGD. AD POST FOR TODAY I.E. 13.06.2016 AT THE ADDRE SS MENTIONED IN FORM NO. 36 VIDE COLUMN NO. 10. 3. ON 13.06.2016, NEITHER THE ASSESSEE NOR HIS AUTHORI SED REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDED THE HEARING AND ALSO NOT FIL ED ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT. IT IS THUS INFERRED THA T THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF ITS APPEAL. 4. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FOLL OWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING T HAT OF MULTIPLAN PAGE 2 OF 3 INDIA LTD. : 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) AND HONBLE MADHYA PRAD ESH HIGH COURTS DECISION IN ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP), I TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UNADMITTED AND DISM ISS THE SAME. I WOULD LIKE TO CLARIFY THAT SUBSEQUENTLY IF THE ASSE SSEE EXPLAINS THE REASONS FOR NON APPEARANCE AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SAT ISFIED, THE MATTER MAY BE RECALLED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADJUDICATION OF THE APPEAL. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED IN LIMINE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 13-06-2016. SD/- [H.S. SIDHU] JUDICIAL MEMBER DATE: 13/6/2016 SRBHATNAGAR COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4.CIT (A) 5. DR , ITAT TRUE COPY BY ORDER, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, DELHI BENCHES PAGE 3 OF 3