IN ENTERTAINMENT INDIA LIMITED, MUMBAI V. INCOME TAX OFFICER 10(1)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 5653/MUM/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 118 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7836 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 3 month(s) 21 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-12-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 06-09-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: S ABI RAMA KARTHIKEYAN

Judgement Text

P A G E | 1 ITA NO. 5653/MUM/2017 A.Y. 2012 - 13 IN ENTERTAINMENT INDIA LTD. VS. ITO - 10(1)(20 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 5653/MUM/2017 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2012 - 13 ) IN ENTERTAINMENT INDIA LTD. 49/50, IN CENTRE, 12 TH ROAD, MIDC, MAROL, ANDHERI (E), MUMBAI 400 093, VS. ITO - 10(1)(2) ROOM NO. 25, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MUMBAI - 400 020 PAN AACCP1555A ( APPELLANT ) ( RESPONDENT ) APPELLANT BY: SHRI RUTURAJ H. GURJAR , A.R. RESPONDENT BY: SHRI S. ABI RAMA KARTHIKEYAN , D.R DATE OF HEARING: 24 .12.2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 2 8 .12.2018 O R D E R PER RAVISH SOOD, JM THE PRESENT APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE CIT(A) - 51, MUMBAI, DATED 09.06.2007 , WHICH IN TURN ARISES FROM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE A.O UNDER SEC.143 (3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (FOR SHORT I.T. ACT), DATED 20.03.2015. 2. THE LD. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (FOR SHORT A.R) FOR THE ASSESSEE AT THE VERY OUTSET OF THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL SUBMITTED THAT AS PER THE INSTRUCTIONS OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY HE SEEKS TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. THE LD. A.R PLACED ON RECORD A LETTER DATED 24.12.2018 WHEREIN IT HAS BEEN STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE COMPANY WANTS TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (FOR SHORT D .R) ON BEING CONFRONTED WITH THE AFORESAID REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE S TATED THAT HE HAD NO OBJECTION IN CASE IF P A G E | 2 ITA NO. 5653/MUM/2017 A.Y. 2012 - 13 IN ENTERTAINMENT INDIA LTD. VS. ITO - 10(1)(20 T HE APPEAL WAS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. WE THUS ON THE BASIS OF THE AFORESAID REQUEST THE ASSESSEE ALLOW THE APPEAL TO BE WITHDRAWN. 3. THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PR ONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 2 8 . 12.2018 S D / - S D / - ( SHAMIM YAHYA) (RAVISH SOOD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI ; 28 . 12.2018 PS. ROHIT / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ( ) / THE CIT(A) - 4. / CIT 5. , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. / GUARD FILE . //TRUE COPY// / BY ORDER, / (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI