M/s Karl Agencies, Hyderabad V. Asst.CIT,Circle 8(1), Hyderabad

ITA 566/HYD/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 132 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6366 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 3 month(s) 22 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 19-07-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 19-07-2016
• Assessment Year: 2001-2002
• Appeal Filed On: 28-03-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A SITHARAMA RAO
• Assessee Lawyers: THAKKAR
• Section: 143(3); 154

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES A (SMC) : HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI D. MANMOHAN, VICE PRESIDENT ITA.NO.566/HYD/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2001-2002 M/S. KARL AGENCIES, HYDERABAD. PAN AABFK9795M VS. ACIT, CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) FOR ASSESSEE : MR. THAKKAR FOR REVENUE : MR. A. SITHARAMA RAO DATE OF HEARING : 19.07.2016 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 19.07.2016 ORDER THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE-FIRM IS DIRECTE D AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A)-III, HYDERABAD DATED 10.02. 2014 AND IT PERTAINS TO THE A.Y. 2001-2002. 2. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE LD. COUNSEL A PPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, FILED LETTER DATED 19.07 .2016 SEEKING PERMISSION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ITS APPEAL AND THE CON TENTS OF THE LETTER ARE AS UNDER: THE ABOVE APPEAL IS POSTED FOR HEARING TODAY I.E. 1 9.07.2016. IN THIS CONNECTION THE APPELLANT BEGS TO SUBMIT THA T THE ABOVE APPEAL WAS FILED AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(APPEALS)-3 , HYDERABAD, DATED 10.02.2014, REJECTING APPELLANT'S APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER UNDER SECTION 154 DATED 15.04.2011. THE CIT (APPEALS) REJECTED THE APPELLANT'S APPEAL HOLDIN G THAT THE GRIEVANCE RELATES TO ORDER U/S. 143(3) RWS 254 DATED 2 ITA.NO.566/HYD/2014 M/S. KARL AGENCIES, HYDERABAD. 15.12.2009 BUT NO APPEAL WAS FILED AGAINST THE SAID O RDER AND IT IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF APPEAL AGAINST ORDER U/S. 154 TO GO INTO THE MERITS OF ORDER U/S.143(3) RWS 254. THEREAF TER, APPELLANT FILED AN APPEAL BEFORE CIT(APPEALS) AGAINS T THE ORDER U/S.143(3) RWS 254 WITH PETITION FOR CONDONATI ON OF DELAY. THIS APPEAL WAS ADMITTED BY CIT(APPEALS) & WAS HEARD ON 07.06.2016. SINCE THE APPEAL WAS ADMITTED AND HE ARD ON MERITS BY CIT(APPEALS), THE PRESENT APPEAL BEFORE H ON'BLE TRIBUNAL HAS BECOME INFRUCTUOUS. THE APPELLANT THER EFORE HUMBLY REQUESTS THE HON'BLE TRIBUNAL TO ALLOW THE S AME TO BE WITHDRAWN. 3. THE LD. D.R. HAS NO OBJECTION IN THIS REGARD. I , THEREFORE, DISMISS THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMIS SED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 19.07.2016. SD/- (D. MANMOHAN) VICE PRESIDENT HYDERABAD DATED 19 TH JULY, 2016 VBP/- COPY TO 1. M/S. KARL AGENCIES, HYDERABAD. C/O. MR. K.L. RATHI, ADVOCATE, 3-5-144/5 EDEN GARDEN, HYDERABAD 500 001. 2. ACIT, CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD. 3. CIT(A)-III, HYDERABAD. 4. CIT-II, HYDERABAD. 5. D.R. ITAT A (SMC)BENCH, HYDERABAD. 6. GUARD FILE