M/s. V.P.C. Financial Services (P) Ltd., New Delhi V. ITO, New Delhi

ITA 567/DEL/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 86538 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 11 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 16-01-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: H
• Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2015
• Assessment Year: 2001-2002
• Appeal Filed On: 31-01-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: J P CHANDRAKAR

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI A.T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 567/DEL/2013 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007 - 08 V.P.C. FINANCIAL SERVICES (P) LTD., 555, DOUBLE STOREY, NEW RAJINDER NAGAR NEW DELHI PANAAACV2608Q VS. ITO WARD - 17 (1) NEW DELHI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: MR. DEEPESH , CA RESPONDENT BY: SHRI J.P. CHANDRAKAR, SR. DR O R D E R PER A.T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD CIT(A) - 19, NEW DELHI DATED 15.11.2012 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2001 - 02 . 2. AT THE OUTSET THE LD AR SUBMITTED THAT AGAINST THE IMPUGNED ORDER THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN PREFERRED WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OF SHRI V.K. CHARORIA, DIRECTOR AND TAX HEAD OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY BY ANOTHER COUNSEL. HOWEVER , MR. V.K. CHARORIA, DIRECTOR AND TAX HEAD OF THE ASSESSEE CO MPANY HA S ENGAGED M/S. VAISH ASSOCIATES ADVOCATES TO FILE THE APPEAL AND THE SAME HAS BEEN FILED BY THE SAID LAW FIRM BEARING ITA NO.674/DEL/2013 , WHICH CAME UP FOR HEARING BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL ON 30.07.2013 AND WAS DISPOSED OFF IN LIMINE BY AN EX - PARTE OR DER. AGAINST THE SAID ORDER M/S. VAISH ASSOCIATES HAS FILED A MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U /S 254(2) OF THE ACT FOR RECALLING THE EX - PARTE ORDER AND IT IS A WAITING THE DECISION OF THIS TRIBUNAL . 3. SO TWO APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE IS AT PRESENT BEFORE THIS TR IBUNAL, AGAINST THE IMPUGNED ORDER . THEREFORE IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, PAGE NO. 2 SINCE APPEAL NO.674/DEL/2013 HAVE BEEN PREFERRED AGAINST THE IMPUGNED ORDER , THIS APPEAL MAY BE ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 4. THE LD DR DOES NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTION FOR THE SAID REQUEST OF THE AR. 5. WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE SAID REQUEST IN WRITING SUBMITTED BY THE LD AR AND SINCE THE DR DOES NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTION, THIS APPEAL IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE NO.567/DEL/2013 STANDS WITHDRAWN IN THE LIGHT OF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE, I.E. NO.674/DEL/2013. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 16 TH JANUARY, 2015. - SD/ - - SD/ - ( R.S. SYAL ) ( A.T. VARKEY ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 16 TH JANUARY, 2015 A K KEOT COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR BY ORDER DEPUTY REGISTRAR, ITAT