IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.567/PUN/2021 िनधाᭅरण वषᭅ / Assessment Year: 2016-17 Bankatlal Badrinarayan Sharma, Row House No.7, Gut No.105, Gopinathpuram, Beed Bypass – 431005. PAN : AEPPS0356G Vs. PCIT, Nashik-1. Appellant Respondent आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM: This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik-1 (‘the PCIT’) dated 17.03.2021 for the assessment year 2016-17. 2. When the matter had come up for hearing, the appellant filed a letter seeking permission to withdraw the above captioned appeal on the ground that in the consequential order giving effect to the order Assessee by : None (Withdrawal Application) Revenue by : Shri Deepak Garg Date of hearing : 14.07.2022 Date of pronouncement : 18.07.2022 ITA No.567/PUN/2021 2 of the Pr.CIT u/s 263, the issue in the appeal stands settled in favour of the appellant. 3. On the other hand, the ld. Department Representative had expressed no objection to permit the withdrawal of the appeal. 4. In the circumstances, we hereby grant permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the above captioned appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. 5. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on this 18 th day of July, 2022. Sd/- Sd/- (S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) (INTURI RAMA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; ᳰदनांक / Dated : 18 th July, 2022. Sujeet आदेश कᳱ ᮧितिलिप अᮕेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथᱮ / The Appellant. 2. ᮧ᭜यथᱮ / The Respondent. 3. The PCIT, Nashik-1. 4. िवभागीय ᮧितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “A” बᱶच, पुणे / DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune. 5. गाडᭅ फ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.