RAJKUMAR FOUNDATION, MUMBAI V. DIT (E)), MUMBAI

ITA 5822/MUM/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2013] 120 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3509 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 9 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 12-06-2013
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 11-06-2013
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 17-08-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH D, MUMBAI . , ! ! ! ! . ' ' ' ' ! !! ! , $ $ $ $ %&' %&' %&' %&' % % % % BEFORE SHRI D. MANMOHAN, VP, AND , SHRI D.KARUNAKAR RAO, AM % %% % . : 5822 / /2011 ( ) !*) A.Y 2011-2012 ITA NO. 5822/MUM/2011 (ASSESSMENT YEAR- 2011-2012) RAJKUMAR FOUNDATION 70-B, GAUTAM COMPLEX, SECTOR-11,CBD BELAPUR, NAVI MUMBAI-400 614. PAN: AABTR6991E VS THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTION), PIRAMAL CHAMBER, LOWER PAREL, MUMBAI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI RAJARSHI DWIVEDY % ! + ,$ /DATE OF HEARING : 12-06-2013 -* + ,$ /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 12-06-2013 & && & . .. . O R D E R . ' ' ' ' ! !! ! , $ $ $ $ %&' %&' %&' %&' PER D.KARUNAKAR RAO, AM THE APPEAL ARISES FROM THE ORD ER OF CIT (A), MUMBAI, DATED 19.05.2011 RELATES T O ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012. 2. THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED FOR THREE TIMES ON 10. 07.2012,30.10.2012,11.02.2013 AS BENCH DID NOT FUNCTIONING. ON 11.06.2013 THE LEARNE D COUNSEL OF THE ASSESSEE REQUESTED FOR ADJOURNMENT AS NO POWER OF ATTORNEY WAS FILED AND T HE CASE ADJOURNED TO 12.06.2013. TODAY I.E. 12.06.2013 NO BODY IS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF ASSESSE E. IT SHOWS THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PURSUE THE APPEAL AND MR. RAKESH FOR ASSESSEE ACKNO WLEDGED THE SAME. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE 2 RAJKUMAR FOUNDATION ITA 5822/M/2011 DECISION OF THE ITAT, IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN IND IA LTD., REPORTED IN 38ITD 320(DEL) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT I N THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS CWT, REPORTED IN (1997) 233 ITR 480 (MP), THE APPEA L FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED, FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE STANDS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 12 H JUNE, 2013. SD/- SD/- ( D.MANMOHAN ) ( D.KARUNAKAR RAO) VICE PRESIDENT AC COUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI : 12 TH JUNE, 2013 PS.- PRAMOD /(,0 COPY TO:- 1) 12 0 THE APPELLANT. 2) /312 0 THE RESPONDENT. 3) 4 ( ) 56 MUMBAI / THE CIT (A)- , MUMBAI. 4) 6 4 6 , 6 MUMBAI 60 THE CIT , MUMBAI, 5) 7!89 /(,( , , / 6 THE D.R. D BENCH, 66 MUMBAI. 6) 9 ) : COPY TO GUARD FILE. &. % / BY ORDER / / TRUE COPY / / / % ; , DY. / ASSTT. REGISTRAR I.T.A.T., MUMBAI