Shri Govindbhai M.Rabari, Baroda V. The Income tax Officer,Ward-2(1), Baroda

ITA 587/AHD/2012

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 89513 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 3 month(s) 5 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 12-06-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 10-06-2015
• Assessment Year: 2001-2002
• Appeal Filed On: 07-03-2012
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MK SINGH
• Assessee Lawyers: N O N E

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD C BENCH BEFORE: S H RI N.S. SAINI , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHR I RAJPAL YADAV , JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI KARAMSINH D. RABARI, 13, KHALIPUR, MANEJA, BARODA - 390013 PAN: AG MPR2162G (APPELLANT) VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1 ), BARODA - 390007 (RESPONDENT) SHRI GOVINDBHAI M. RABARI, RABARIWAS, P.O. DASHRATH BARODA - 391350 PAN: AGMPR2161F (APPELLANT) VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1), BARODA - 390007 (RESPONDENT) SHRI GOVINDBHAI M. RABARI, RABARIWAS, P.O. DASHRATH BARODA - 391350 PAN: AGMPR2161F (APPELLANT) VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1), BARODA - 390007 (RESPONDENT) I T A NO . 585 / A HD/20 12 A SSESSMENT YEAR 20 0 0 - 01 ITA NO. 586 /AHD/20 12 A SSESSMENT YEA R 20 00 - 01 ITA NO. 587 /AHD/20 12 A SSESSMENT YEAR 2001 - 02 I.T.A NO S. 585,586,587 /AHD/2012 A.Y. 20 00 - 01 & 2001 - 02 PAGE NO KARAMSINH D. RABARI VS. ITO & GOVINDBHAI M. RABARI VS. ITO 2 REVENUE BY: S H RI M.K. SINGH , SR. D.R ASSESSEE BY: N ONE DATE OF HEARING : 08 - 06 - 2 015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 12 - 06 - 2 015 / ORDER P ER BENCH : - THE PRESENT APPEAL S ARE DIRECTED AT THE INSTANCE OF ASSESSEES AGAINST SEPARATE ORDERS OF EVEN DATE I.E. 02 - 12 - 11 PASSED ON THE RESPECTIVE APPEALS OF THE APPELLANTS IN ASSESSMENT YEARS 2000 - 01 AND 2001 - 02. 2. THE REGISTRY HAS POINTED OUT THAT THE APPELLANTS HAVE FAILED TO SUB MIT THE ORIGINAL COPIES OF CHALL ANS EXHIBITING PAYMENT OF TRIBUNAL FEES. A DEFECT MEM O TO THIS EFFECT WAS ISSUED TO BOTH THE APPELLANTS. BUT THE DEFECT HAS NOT BEEN REMOVED. IN SPITE OF NOTICE, NO - ONE HAS COME PRESENT ALSO. SINCE THE APPELLANTS FAILED TO REMIT THE TRIBUNAL S FEES, THEREFORE, THE APPEALS ARE NOT MAINTAINABLE IN THE PRESE NT FORM. ACCORDINGLY, ALL THE THREE APPEALS ARE REJECTED IN LIMINE ORDER PR O NOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 12 - 06 - 2015 SD/ - SD/ - ( N.S. SAINI ) ( RAJPAL YADAV ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD : DATED 12 /06 /2015 AK I.T.A NO S. 585,586,587 /AHD/2012 A.Y. 20 00 - 01 & 2001 - 02 PAGE NO KARAMSINH D. RABARI VS. ITO & GOVINDBHAI M. RABARI VS. ITO 3 / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: - 1. ASSESSEE 2. REVENUE 3. CONCERNED CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER/ , / ( ,