Dr. Sri Ganesh, Bangalore V. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangaluru-2, Bengaluru

ITA 59/BANG/2021

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 105 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9514 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
• Duration Of Justice: 10 month(s) 16 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 30-01-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2015-2016
• Appeal Filed On: 14-03-2021
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SUMER SINGH
• Keywords: Revision of order
• Section: 263; 143(3)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 59/Bang/2021 Assessment Year : 2015-16 Dr. Sri Ganesh, # 16, Sri Nilayam, 4 th Cross, 1 st Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore – 560011. PAN: AANPG1386J Vs. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bengaluru – 2, Bengaluru. APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Smt. Suman Lunkar, CA Revenue by : Shri Sumer Singh Meena, CIT (DR) Date of Hearing : 31-01-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 31-01-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal by the assessee has been filed by assessee against the order dated 16.03.2020 by Ld.Pr.CIT, Bengaluru-2, Bengaluru for assessment year 2015-16. 2. The assessee has filed a letter dated 29.01.2022 as under: “The following is submitted for the kind consideration of Honorable Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "A" Bench, Bangalore. 1. The appellant had tiled an appeal against the order passed u/s 263 of the Act for the AY 2015-16. 2. This appeal is posted for hearing on 31/01/2022. 3. The Consequential assessment u/s 143(3) r. w.s 263 of the Act was made vide order dated 22/09/2021 and the appellant has accepted the assessment made. Page 2 of 2 ITA No. 59/Bang/2021 4. In view of the above, it is requested that the appeal filed against the order passed u/s 263 of the Act may kindly be treated as withdrawn. 5. The appellant submits accordingly.” The Ld.AR submitted that the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, in lieu of the above letter. 3. We heard Ld D.R, who did not object to the prayer of the assessee. In view of the above, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 31 st January, 2022. Sd/- Sd/- (CHANDRA POOJARI) (BEENA PILLAI) Accountant Member Judicial Member Bangalore, Dated, the 31 st January, 2022. /MS / Copy to: 1. Appellant 4. CIT(A) 2. Respondent 5. DR, ITAT, Bangalore 3. CIT 6. Guard file By order Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Bangalore