Shri Babulalbhai jivrajbhai Gadara, Surat V. ITO, Ward-3(2)(1), Surat, Surat

ITA 59/SRT/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4760 (ITAT-SURAT)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 08-02-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 01-02-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ANUPAMA SINGLA

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR.SHRI ARJUN LAL SAINI, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (VIRTUAL HEARING) . . ./ I.T.A NOS.59 & 60/SRT/2019 [ [ / ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2010-11 & 2011-12 SHRI BABUBHAI JIVRAJBHAI GADARA, A-5, BHAGAT NAGAR SOCIETY, KATARGAM ROAD, NEAR ILA PARK SOCIETY, SURAT 395004. [PAN: ACLPG 5687 N] VS . THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2)(1), SURAT. / APPELLANT /RESPONDENT [ /ASSESSEE BY NONE. /REVENUE BY SMT. ANUPAMA SINGLA - SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING: 08 . 0 2 .20 2 1 /PRONOUNCEMENT ON: 08 . 0 2 .202 1 /O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMEBER: 1. THESE TWO APPEALS BY THE SAME ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE SEPARATE ORDERS OF LD.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-3, SURAT DATED 29.11.2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS (AY) 2010-11 AND 2011-12. 2. BOTH THE APPEALS CAME UP FOR HEARING ON 8 TH FEBRUARY 2021. THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION DATED 29.01.2021 FOR WITHDRAWAL OF BOTH APPEALS ON THE GROUND THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS SETTLED THE DISPUTE WITH THE REVENUE UNDER VIVAD SE VISVAS SCHEME -2020 AND HAD ALREADY RECEIVED BABUBHAI JIVRAJBHAI GADARA VS. ITO, WARD-3(2)(1), SURAT.(02 APPEALS)/ ITA NOS.59 & 60/SRT/2019 FOR A.Y. 2010-11 & 11-12 2 FORM-3, VIDE CERTIFICATE NO.231346180290121 IN ITA NO.59/SRT/2019 AND NO.231357450290121 IN ITA NO.60/SRT/2019 RESPECTIVELY, ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SURAT-1, DATED 29.01.2021 COPIES OF WHICH ARE FILED. THE LD. AR FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITS THAT THE ASSESSEE SHALL PAY THE FULL AND FINAL DEMAND AS PER UNDERTAKING GIVEN BY ASSESSEE. THE LD.AR OF ASSESSEE PRAYED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE BOTH THE APPEALS. 3. THE LD.DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE SR.DR APPEARING FOR THE REVENUE HAS NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. CONSIDERING THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE, THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW HIS APPEALS. RESULTANTLY, BOTH THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER ANNOUNCED AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF APPEAL ON 8 TH FEBRUARY 2021 IN THE VIRTUAL COURT HEARING. SD/- SD/- (DR.ARJUN LAL SAINI) (PAWAN SINGH) ( /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ( /JUDICIAL MEMBER) / SURAT, DATED : 8 TH FEB 2021 / #SGR COPY OF ORDER SENT TO- ASSESSEE/AO/PR. CIT/ CIT (A)/ ITAT (DR)/GUARD FILE OF ITAT. BY ORDER / / TRUE COPY / / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, SURAT