Bheru Lal Surana, RAJSAMAND V. DCIT, UDAIPUR

ITA 591/JODH/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2012] 119 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7892 (ITAT-JODHPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 8 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 13-09-2012
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Next Hearing Date: 13-09-2012
• Assessment Year: 2000-2001
• Appeal Filed On: 16-12-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: G R KOKANI

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR BEFORE SHRI HARI OM MARATHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI N.K.SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 591/JU/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2000-01 SHRI BHERU LAL SURANA VS. THE D.C.I.T S/0 SHRI HAZARI LAL SURANA CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 VILLAGE PADASALI UDAIPUR RAJSAMAND PAN NO. ANVPS 5033 R (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY : SHRI G.R. KOKANI DATE OF HEARING : 13.09.2012 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 13.09.2012 ORDER PER HARI OM MARATHA, J.M. THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A), JAIPUR DATED 01.10.2010 FOR A. Y 2000-01. 2 2. NONE APPEARED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN THE CASE WAS CALLED FOR HEARING IN SPITE OF SEVERAL ADJOURNM ENTS. FROM THIS, IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PURS UE HIS CASE. SO IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., [1991] 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO ON THE JUDGEMENT OF THE HON'BLE M.P. HIGH COURT IN THE CAS E OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT [1997] 223 ITR 480, THE A PPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS NOT ADMITTED AND IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE . 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 13-09-2012. SD/- SD/- (N.K.SAINI) [HARI OM MARATHA] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : 13 TH SEPTEMBER, 2012 VL/- COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT 4. THE CIT(A) BY ORDER 5. THE DR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, JODHPUR