SHRI MAHENDRA RAISONI, V. D.C.I.T. CENTRALCIRCLE 2(3), Nagpur

ITA 591/NAG/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7577 (ITAT-NAGPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 1 month(s) 29 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 20-01-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2004-2005
• Appeal Filed On: 22-11-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: AGNES P THOMAS

Judgement Text

, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH, NAGPUR (AT E-COURT, PUNE) BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM . / ITA NOS.590 TO 592/NAG/2016 / ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2003-04 TO 2005-06 MAHENDRA RAISONI, ..APPELLANT. VISION 19, GANPATI NAGAR, JALGAON, MAHARASHTRA. PAN : AANPR5892E. VS. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(3), NAGPUR. ..RESPONDENT. ASSESSEE BY : SHRI SAKET BHATTAD. REVENUE BY : SMT. AGNES P. THOMAS. / ORDER THE THREE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED A GAINST THE SEPARATE ORDERS PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-3, NAGPUR ON 19.09.2016 IN RELATION TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR S 2003-04 TO 2005-06. 2. BEFORE US, THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED A LETTER DATED 13.01.2 021 SEEKING WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEALS. THE RELEVANT CONTENTS OF SUCH LETTER READ AS UNDER : 1. THE APPELLANT HAS PENDING APPEAL BEFORE YOUR HO NOUR, WHICH WAS FILED ON 22.11.2016 BEARING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT NUMBER 590/NA G/2016 AND 591/NAG/2016 AND 592/NAG/2016 FOR A.YS. 2003-04, 20 04-05 AND 2005- 06, RESPECTIVELY. / DATE OF HEARING : 20.01.2021 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 20.01.2021 2 2. IN RESPECT OF THE ABOVE APPEAL(S), THE UNDERSIGN ED PRAYS TO KINDLY ALLOW THE APPELLANT TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL(S), AS THE APP ELLANT IS OPTING TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE THROUGH VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME. THE A PPELLANT FURTHER STATES THAT FORM 3 HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE CIT IN AL L THE THREE CASES ABOVE, WHICH ARE ATTACHED HEREWITH, AND NOW FOR THE PURPOS E OF FILING FORM 4, WITHDRAWAL APPLICATION IS MANDATORILY REQUIRED. HE NCE, THIS APPLICATION. 3. THE LD. DR DID NOT RAISE ANY OBJECTION TO THE WITHDRA WAL OF THE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. AS SUCH, THE ASSESSEE IS PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 20 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021. SD/- SD/- (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) (R.S. SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT PUNE; DATED : 20 TH JANUARY, 2021. YAMINI !'#$%$' / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT 3. 4. 5 6. CIT(A) - 3 , NAGPUR. THE CIT(CENTRAL), NAGPUR. !''#$,& #$ ,! / DR, ITAT, NAGPUR PUNE; !()*/ GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER // TRUE COPY // + ,-'.#/ / SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY & #$ , / ITAT, PUNE.