Sidharth Bansal Prop. M/s. Radha Krishna, MAKRANA V. ITO, MAKRANA

ITA 597/JODH/2009

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 134 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9474 (ITAT-JODHPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 1 month(s) 25 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 02-02-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2014
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 07-12-2009
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR BEFORE SHRI S.V. MEHROTRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI V.D. RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 597/JU/2009 ASSTT. YEAR : 2006-07 SIDHARTH BANSAL, VS. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, KRISHNA MARBLES, MAKRANA. WARD 2, MAKRANA. (PAN ACAPB 7786 Q) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI AVADHESH KUMAR, D.R. O R D E R PER S.V. MEHROTRA, A.M : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST TH E ORDER PASSED BY THE LD. CIT(A) DATED 02.09.2009. 2. WHEN THIS APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING, NOBOD Y APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPITE NOTICE THROUGH REGD. AD SERVED UPO N THE ASSESSEE, NOR WAS THERE ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, IT A PPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING ITS APPEAL. WE, THEREFORE , DISMISS THIS APPEAL FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., (1991) 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO OF M.P. HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480, AS THE APPEAL BECOMES I NFRUCTUOUS FOR NON-PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. THE ORDE R WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONCLUSION OF HEARING ON 02.02.20 11. SD/- SD/- (V.D. RAO) (S.V. MEHROTRA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCO UNTANT MEMBER DATED : 3 RD FEBRUARY, 2011 2 *AKS/- COPY FORWARDED TO:- 1. APPELLANT, 2. RESPONDENT, 3. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, 4. CIT, 5. D/R 6. GUARD FILE