AHYA HOLDINGS P. LTD, MUMBAI V. ACIT CEN CIR 22,

ITA 5998/MUM/2013

• Counselvise Citation: 599819914 RSA 2013
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 10 month(s) 16 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 26-08-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 26-08-2015
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 10-10-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ASHWA NI SINHA
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH A, MUMBAI BEORE SHRI G.S.PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA 5998/MUM/2013 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10) M/S.AHA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS IDREAM HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.), 161, STAR CITY, 2 ND FLOOR, MANMALA TANK ROAD, MAHIM(W), MUMBAI 400 016 PAN: AAFCS 6404E ... APPELLANT VS. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CEN.CIRCLE-22, AAYKAR BHAVAN, MK ROAD, MUMBAI 400 020 .... RESPONDENT ASSESSEE BY : SHRI HIRO RAI REVENUE BY : SHRI ASHWANI SINHA DATE OF HEARING : 26/08/2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 26/08/2015 ORDER PER G.S. PANNU,AM: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL IS PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSE E AND IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 21/08/20 13 OF CIT(A)- 14, MUMBAI PERTAINING TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 -10, WHICH IN-TURN HAS ARISEN FROM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE AS SESSING OFFICER 2 AHA HOLDINGS PVT. L TD. UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ( IN SHORT THE ACT). 2. A LETTER DATED 26 TH AUGUST, 2015 HAS BEEN FILED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE BY THE LD. REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE T HE ASSESSEE, IN WHICH IT HAS BEEN STATED AS UNDER:- REF:- AHA HOLDING P LTD. V. ACIT ITA NO.5998/M/13-A.Y 2009-10 WI THDRAWAL OF APPEAL. THE ABOVE APPEAL HAS BEEN FIXED FOR HEARING TODAY B EFORE THE A BENCH. I HAVE BEEN AUTHORISED TO APPEAR FOR THE SAME. THE L ETTER OF AUTHORITY IN MY FAVOUR IS ENCLOSED. UNDER INSTRUCTIONS, IT IS SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESS EE DOES NOT WISH TO PURSUE THIS APPEAL. IT IS THEREFORE, REQUESTED THAT THE A PPEAL MAY PLEASE BE PERMITTED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 3. LD. DR DID NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO SUCH REQUES T FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, AFTER HEARING BOTH THE PARTIES, THE APPEAL WAS PERMITTED TO BE WITHDRAWN. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. THE DECISION WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING IN THE PRESENCE OF BOTH T HE PARTIES ON 26/08/2015. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 26 TH AUGUST, 2015 SD/- SD/- (SANDEEP GOSAIN) ( G.S. PANNU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT M EMBER MUMBAI,DATED 26/08/2015 VM. 3 AHA HOLDINGS PVT. L TD. COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(A)- 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER, //TRUE COPY// (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, MUMBA I VM , SR. PS