M/S CRYSTAL BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS , MUMBAI V. ITO WARD 24 (1)(4), MUMBAI

ITA 6047/MUM/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0215 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 9 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 24-06-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 24-09-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SMITA VERMA
• Section: 201

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES SMC , MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY , JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 6047 /MUM/2019 ASSESSMENT Y EAR: 2013 - 14 M/S CRYSTAL BUILDERS AND DEVELOPER S, 21, AWADHOOT CHS LTD., AZAD NAGAR, J.P. ROAD, ANDHERI (W), MUMBAI - 400053 PAN: AAHFC2094D VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER - 24 (1)(4), PC - 607, PIRAMAL CHAMBERS, LALBAUG, PAREL, MUMBAI - 400012 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : MS. SMITA VERMA (DR ) DATE OF HEARING : 24/06 /202 1 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 24 / 0 6 /202 1 O R D E R PER SAKTIJIT DEY , JM THIS IS AN APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST OR DER DATED 28.06 .2019 OF LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 36 , MUMBAI FOR THE ASSESSM ENT YEAR 2013 - 14 . 2. AT THE TIME OF CALL , NO ONE WAS PRESENT FOR THE ASSESSEE. HOWEVER, THE AUTHORIZED R EPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSESSE E HAS FILED LETTER DATED 09.04.2021 STATIN G THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED FOR SETTLING THE DISPUTE ARISING IN THE APPEAL UNDER THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 AND HAS ALSO RECEIVED CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY IN FORM - 3. IT IS ALSO STATED , THE ASSESSEE H AS ALSO PAID THE TAX TOWARDS FINAL SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTE. COPIES OF FORM 3 AND CHALLAN EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF TAX HAVE BEEN ENCLOSED TO THE AFORESAID LETTER. THUS, PERMISSION HAS BEEN SOUGHT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. 2 ITA NO. 6047 / MUM/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 201 3 - 1 4 3. THE LE ARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE. 4. IN VIEW OF THE FACT S DISCUSSED ABOVE AND CONSIDERING ASSESSEES REQUEST, WE PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF THE PRESENT APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 5 . IN THE RESULT, APPEAL IS DISMISSED . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 24 TH JUNE , 2021 . SD/ - SD/ - ( RAJESH KUMAR ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (SAKTIJIT DEY) JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI ; DATED: 24 / 06 /202 1 ALINDRA, PS / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ( ) / THE CIT(A) - 4 . / CIT 5. , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. / GUARD FILE . //TRUE COPY// / BY ORDER, / (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI