, SMC(A) , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC(A) BENCH : KOLKATA () BEFORE , ) [BEFORE HONBLE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM] / I.T.A NO. 605/KOL/2009 !' !' !' !'/ // / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2003-04 M/S. THE ASTORIA, HOOGHLY VS INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WD-1(2), HOOGHLY (PAN-AABFT 5991 Q) ($% /APPELLANT ) (&'$%/ RESPONDENT ) FOR THE APPELLANT: N O N E FOR THE RESPONDENT: SHRI P. P. SARKAR () / ORDER THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE IS ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER OF CIT(A)-XXXVII, KOLKATA IN APPEAL NO.59/CIT(A)-XXXVII/1(2)HG./05-06 VIDE ORDER DATED 11.12.2008. THE ASSESSMENT WAS FRAMED BY ITO, WARD-1(2), HOOGHLY U/S 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE ACT) FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2003- 04 VIDE HIS ORDER DATED 09.09.2005. 2. THIS APPEAL CAME OF HEARING ON 21.05.2009 FOR TH E FIRST TIME AND SUBSEQUENTLY ON 23.06.2009, 22.07.2009, 26.08.2009, 21.04.2010, 3.5 .2010, 5.7.2010, 3.11.2010, 2.12.2010 AND FINALLY FOR 14.03.2011. NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE ASS ESSEE BUT DID NOT ATTEND THE HEARING DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICES. NO ADJOURNMENT PETITION WAS MOV ED. IT MEANS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PROSECUTE THIS APPEAL. 3. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE DE CISION IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320, WE DISMISS THIS APPEA L AS ASSESSEE NOT INTERESTED. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION. 5. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 14 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2011. SD/- , (MAHAVIR SINGH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ( *+ *+ *+ *+) )) ) DATED 14 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2011 ,- ./ 0 JD.(SR.P.S.) () 1 &2 3(2!4- COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: ITA 605/K/2009 M/S. THE ASTORIA AY 03-04 1 . $% / APPELLANT M/S. THE ASTORIA, KANAILAL AVENUE, P.O. CHANDANNAGAR, DIST. HOOGHLY, PIN-712 136 2 &'$% / RESPONDENT, ITO, WARD-1(2), HOOGHLY. 3 . ) / THE CIT(A), KOLKATA 4. ) ( )/ CIT, KOLKATA 5 . ;< & / DR, KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA '2 &/ TRUE COPY, ()=/ BY ORDER, / /ASSTT. REGISTRAR .