Appeal details
Counselvise Citation
[2010] 135 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8758 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
Duration Of Justice
8 month(s) 1 day(s)
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date
23-09-2010
Appeal Filed By
Assessee
Order Result
Dismissed
Bench Allotted
B
Next Hearing Date
04-06-2012
Assessment Year
2005-2006
Appeal Filed On
21-01-2010
Judgement Text
IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCH B, BANGALORE BEFORE DR. O.K.NARAYANAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SMT P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. NO.61(BANG.)/2010 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2005-06) M/S GREEN AGRO PACK PRIVATE LIMITED, NO.2821, HAL II STAGE, 6 TH CROSS, 18 TH MAIN, BANGALORE-560 008. APPELLANT VS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-11(3), BANGALORE RESPO NDENT APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI MANOJ KUMAR, ADDL.CIT O R D E R PER SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JM; THIS IS AN APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDE R OF CIT(A), BANGALORE DATED 16-11-2009 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2005-06. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE APPEAL, NONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. HOWEVER, SHRI MANOJ KUMAR, LEARNED REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE REVENUE WAS PRESENT. IT IS S EEN THAT THE ASSESSEE HAD FILED THIS APPEAL IN THE MONTH OF JANU ARY, 2010. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE HEARING WAS ADJOURNED ON THE REQU EST OF ASSESSEE ON VARIOUS OCCASIONS. ITA.NO.61(B)/10 2 3. IT IS THEREFORE, HELD THAT SINCE THE ASSESSEE DOES NOT SEEM TO BE INTERESTED TO PURSUE ITS APPEAL, WITHOUT GOIN G INTO THE MERITS OF THE CASE AND IN THE LIGHT OF THE DECISION OF THE TR IBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT VS MULTIPLAN INDIA (PVT.) LTD., (38 ITD 320) THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS HEREBY DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 20 TH SEPTEMBER, 2010. ( DR.O.K.NARAYANAN) (SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER PLACE: BANGALORE DATED: 2010. AM* COPY TO : 1. THE ASSESSEE 2. THE REVENUE 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR 6. GF(BLORE) BY ORDER AR, ITAT, BANGALORE
