DCIT, New Delhi V. Global Vantedge Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 6105/DEL/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 133 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6362 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 4 month(s) 3 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 15-03-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 15-03-2016
• Assessment Year: 2005-2006
• Appeal Filed On: 11-11-2013
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: T VASANTHAN
• Keywords: Tax effect

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH C, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI J.S. REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 6105/DEL/2013 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2005-06 DCIT, CIRCLE 12(1), VS. M/S GLOBAL VANTEDGE PV T LTD., NEW DELHI A-16/9, VASANT VIHAR, NEW DELHI 57 (PAN: AABCR8435J) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SH. T. VASANTHAN, SR. D R RESPONDENT BY : SH. MAYANK AGGARWAL, CA DATE OF HEARING : 15-03-2016 DATE OF ORDER : 15-03-2016 ORDER PER H.S. SIDHU, J.M. THIS APPEAL BY THE DEPARTMENT IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 05.8.2013 OF LD. CIT(A)-XV, NEW DELHI PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-06 ON THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS:- 1. WHETHER LD. CIT(A) WAS CORRECT ON FACTS AND CIR CUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN LAW IN DELETING THE PENALTY OF RS. 6,6 9,586/- LEVIED BY AO ON ACCOUNT OF FURNISHING INACCURATE PARTICULARS OF INCOME? 2. WHETHER LD. CIT(A) WAS CORRECT ON FACTS AND CIRC UMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN LAW IN NOT CONSIDERING THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE APEX COURT IN THE CASE OF M/S LIBERTY INDIA LTD. 183 TAX MAN 349 WHEREIN THE APEX COURT HAS DEFINED THE WORD DERIVED AND ATTRIBUTABLE RELEVANT IN THIS CASE, AND ALLOWING RELIEF BY RELYI NG ON DECISION OF HONBLE SPECIAL BENCH OF ITAT, INDORE IN THE CASE O F M/S MARAL OVERSEAS (ITA NO. 777/204 AND 294/IND.2006)? 3. THE APPELLANT CRAVES LEAVE, TO ADD, ALTER OR AME ND ANY GROUND OF APPEAL RAISED ABOVE AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING. ITA NO.6105/DEL/2013 2 2. WE FIND THAT REVENUE IN THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL HAS CHALLENGED THE DELETION OF PENALTY OF RS. 6,69,586 /- VIDE GROUND NO. 1, AS AFORESAID. 3. FROM THE ABOVE, WE FIND THAT THE TAX EFFECT IN T HE REVENUES APPEAL IS LESS THAN RS.10,00,000/-, THEREFORE, THE DEPARTMENTS AP PEAL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE, IN VIEW OF THE CIRCULAR NO. 21/2015 DATED 10 TH DECEMBER, 2015 ISSUED VIDE F.NO. 279/MISC. 142/2007-ITJ (PT.) BY THE CBDT. FO R THE SAKE OF CONVENIENCE, THE RELEVANT PARA NOS. 3 & 10 OF THE AFORESAID CBDT S CIRCULAR ARE REPRODUCED AS UNDER:- 3. HENCEFORTH, APPEALS/ SLPS SHALL NOT BE FILED IN CASES WHERE THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE MONETARY L IMITS GIVEN HEREUNDER: S NO APPEALS IN INCOME-TAX MATTERS MONETARY LIMIT (IN RS) 1 BEFORE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 10,00,000/- 2 BEFORE HIGH COURT 20,00,000/- 3 BEFORE SUPREME COURT 25,00,000/- IT IS CLARIFIED THAT AN APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE FILED MERELY BECAUSE THE TAX EFFECT IN A CASE EXCEEDS THE MONETA RY LIMITS PRESCRIBED ABOVE. FILING OF APPEAL IN SUCH CASES IS TO BE DECIDED ON MERITS OF THE CASE. 10. THIS INSTRUCTION WILL APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY TO PENDING APPEALS AND APPEALS TO BE FILED HENCEFORTH IN HIGH COURTS/ TRIBUNALS. PENDING APPEALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED TAX LIMITS IN PARA 3 ABOVE MAY BE WITHDRAWN/ NOT PRESSED. APPEALS BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT WILL BE GOVERNED BY THE INSTRUCTI ONS ON THIS SUBJECT, OPERATIVE AT THE TIME WHEN SUCH APPEA L WAS FILED. 4. IT IS NOT IN DISPUTE THAT THE BOARDS INSTRUCTIO N OR DIRECTIONS ISSUED TO THE INCOME-TAX AUTHORITIES ARE BINDING ON THOSE AUTHORI TIES, THEREFORE, THE DEPARTMENT SHOULD HAVE WITHDRAWN/ NOT PRESSED THE P RESENT APPEAL, IN VIEW OF ITA NO.6105/DEL/2013 3 THE AFORESAID INSTRUCTIONS SINCE THE TAX EFFECT IN THE INSTANT APPEAL IS LESS THAN THE AMOUNT OF RS. 10 LACS, PRESCRIBED IN THE ABOVE SAID CBDTS INSTRUCTIONS. 5. KEEPING IN VIEW THE CBDT INSTRUCTION NO. 21/2015 DATED 10 TH DECEMBER, 2015, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE REVENUE SHOULD HA VE WITHDRAWN/ NOT PRESSED THE INSTANT APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. WE ARE ALS O OF THE VIEW THAT THE SAID INSTRUCTIONS ARE APPLICABLE FOR THE PENDING APPEALS AND APPEALS TO BE FILED HENCEFORTH IN TRIBUNAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE REVENUES APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 6. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE STAN DS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15/03/2016. SD/- SD/- (J.S. REDDY) (H.S. SIDHU) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIA L MEMBER DATED: 15/03/2016 *SR BHATNAGAR* COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT TRUE COPY BY ORDER, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR