आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘बी’ ायपीठ चे ई म । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय -ी महावीर िसंह, उपा34 एवं माननीय -ी मनोज कु मार अ9वाल ,लेखा सद< के सम4। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No. 624/Chny/2020 (िनधाEरणवषE / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Shri. Samsudeen Basheer D.No. 1/470, East Street, Periapattinam Ramanathapuram -623501. बनाम/ V s . ITO Ward -1, Ramanathapuram. थायीलेखासं. /जीआइआरसं. /P AN / G I R N o . AR J P B- 5 6 5 3 - L (अ पीलाथ /Appellant) : ( थ / Respondent) अपीलाथ कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri N. Quadir Hoseyn (Advocate) – Ld. AR थ कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) –Ld. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date of Hearing : 23-03-2022 घोषणाकीतारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 23-03-2022 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Madurai [CIT(A)] dated 05-03-2020 in the matter of ITA No.624/Chny/2020 - 2 - assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 144 of the Act on 29-12-2017. 2. The Registry has noted a delay of 27 days in the appeal, the condonation of which has been sought by the assessee om the strength of condonation petition dated 25-02-2022 which is accompanied by the affidavit of the assessee. The delay has been attributed to the fact that due to corona restrictions, the assessee could not hand over the papers to the concerned Advocate. Though Ld. Sr. DR opposed the condonation, however, keeping in view the contents of condonation petition as well as considering the period of delay, we condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication on merits. 3. Upon perusal of assessment order, it could be seen that the assessment has been framed on best judgment basis u/s 144 since the assessee did not furnish requisite evidences / explanation. Accordingly, the assessee was saddled with additions of Rs.37.28 Lacs as well as another addition of Rs.205 Lacs. 4. Though the assessee preferred further appeal, however, none appeared for assessee during appellate proceedings despite being provided with various opportunities of being heard as noted in the impugned order. Accordingly, the assessment was confirmed against which the assessee is in further appeal before us. The Ld. AR sought another opportunity of hearing before lower authorities. The Ld. Sr. DR, on the other hand, pleaded for dismissal of the appeal 5. After careful consideration of material facts, though we concur with the submissions of the revenue that the assessee has remained negligent in attending the proceedings before lower authorities, however, keeping in view the principle of natural justice and keeping in view the ITA No.624/Chny/2020 - 3 - fact that the assessee is a resident individual, we deem it fit to grant another opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication with a direction to the assessee to substantiate his case forthwith failing which Ld. CIT(A) shall be at liberty to dispose-off the appeal on the basis of material on record by way of speaking order. 6. The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 23 rd March, 2022. Sd/- (MAHAVIR SINGH) उपा34 /VICE PRESIDENT Sd/- (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) लेखा सद< /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER चे)ई/ Chennai; िदनांक/ Dated : 23-03-2022 JPV JPVJPV JPV आदेशकीXितिलिपअ9ेिषत/ Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ /Appellant2. यथ /Respondent 3. आयकरआयु (अपील)/CIT(A)4. आयकरआयु /CIT 5. िवभागीय ितिनिध/DR6. गाड फाईल/GF