VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES A, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 625/JP/2018 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013-14 SMT. SHANTI JAIN, PROP.-M/S SANMATI ENTERPRISES, VILLAGE- PACHEWAR, TEH.-MAIPURA, DISTT.- TONK, RAJASTHAN. CUKE VS. I.T.O., WARD, TONK LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: ADWPJ 3811 H VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY : MS. SHIVANGI SAMDHANI (CA) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY(ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 12/03/2021 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 15/03/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-3, JAIPUR DATED 14/03/2018 FOR THE A.Y. 2013-14. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION MADE IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: ITA 625/JP/2018_ SMT. SHANTI JAIN VS ITO 2 IT IS MOST HUMBLY SUBMITTED THAT THE QUANTUM APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE FOR A.Y. 2013-14 IS PENDING BEFORE THE HON'BLE BENCH IN ITA NO: 625/JP/18. IT IS SUBMITTED THAT THE HON'BLE FINANCE MINISTER IN HER BUDGET SPEECH OF 2020 ANNOUNCED A DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCHEME VIVAD SE VISHWAS. THE SCHEME WAS FORMULATED INTO THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 (DTVSV) ON 17 TH MARCH, 2020. THE ACT PROVIDES THAT ANY ASSESSEE WHOSE APPEAL WAS PENDING AS ON 31 ST JANUARY, 2020 CAN SETTLE HIS DISPUTE BY FILING A DECLARATION U/S 4(1) OF DTVSV IN FORM-1 AND FORM-2. THE ABOVE MENTIONED APPEAL WAS PENDING AS ON 31 ST JANUARY, 2020.THE APPEAL HAS NOT BEEN DECIDED TILL DATE, THEREFORE, THE ASSESSEE IS ELIGIBLE FOR OPTING THE SCHEME. THE ASSESSEE FILED DECLARATION IN FORM-1 AND FORM-2 ON 11/12/2020 BEFORE THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY. ON 27/01/2021, THE ASSESSEE RECEIVED FORM-3 I.E. FORM FOR CERTIFICATE U/S 5(1) OF DTVSV FROM DESIGNATED AUTHORITY. SECTION 4(2) OF DTVSV, PROVIDES THAT WHERE DECLARATION HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE THE APPEAL SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN FROM THE DATE ON WHICH CERTIFICATE U/S 5(1) OF DTVSV IS ISSUED BY THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY. HENCE, IN THE PRESENT CASE, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE STANDS WITHDRAWN ON 27/01/2021. IN VIEW OF ABOVE YOU ARE REQUESTED TO KINDLY TREAT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE TO BE WITHDRAWN AND NECESSARY ACTION MAY PLEASE BE TAKEN. SUBMITTED MOST RESPECTFULLY ITA 625/JP/2018_ SMT. SHANTI JAIN VS ITO 3 FOR SHANTI JAIN (SHIVANGI SAMDHANI) A/R 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW HER APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15 TH MARCH, 2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 15/03/2021 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SMT. SHANTI JAIN, TONK. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE ITO, WARD, TONK. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 525/JP/2018) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR