Late Shri Arvind Vithaldas Joshi, L/H. Mahesh Arvindbhai Joshi, Gandhidham V. The Pr. CIT-1, Rajkot, Rajkot

ITA 63/RJT/2022

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 101 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9817 (ITAT-RAJKOT)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 8 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-11-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Next Hearing Date: 19-11-2023
• Assessment Year: 2017-2018
• Appeal Filed On: 21-03-2022
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SHRISHRAMDEEPSINHA
• Assessee Lawyers: SHRIMANISHVORA

Judgement Text

आयकरअपीलीयअधिकरण , राजकोटनयायपीी INTHEINCOMETAXAPPELLATETRIBUNAL, RAJKOTBENCH,RAJKOT (ConductedthroughE-Court) BEFORESHRIWASEEMAHMED,ACCOUNTANTMEMBER And SHRITRSENTHILKUMAR,JUDICIALMEMBER आयकरअपीलसं ./ITANo.63/Rjt/2022 धििाधरणणवध / Asstt.Year:2017-2018 LateShriArvindVithaldasJoshi, L/H.MaheshA.Joshi, MaitriBhavan, PlotNo.18,Sector-8, Gandhidham-370201. PAN:AAPPJ6926P Vs.ThePr.CIT-1, Rajkot. (Applicant)(Respondent) Assesseeby:ShriManishVora,A.R Revenueby:ShriShramdeepSinha,Sr.DR सुिणाईकीतारीख /DateofHearing:20/11/2023 घोवणाकीतारीख/DateofPronouncement:29/11/2023 आदेश/ORDER PERWASEEMAHMED,ACCOUNTANTMEMBER: Thecaptionedappealhasbeenfiledattheinstanceoftheassesseeagainst theorderoftheLd.Pr.CommissionerofIncomeTax,Rajkot-1,arisinginthe matteroforderpassedunderSection263oftheIncomeTaxAct,1961(here-in- afterreferredtoas"theAct")relevanttotheAssessmentYear2017-18. 2.Attheoutset,itwasnoticedthattheAssesseevideletterdated27/11/2023 requestedtowithdrawtheappeal.Therelevantextractoftheletterisreproduced asunder: AforesaidappealwasfiledagainstanorderpassedU/s263oftheactdated14.02.2022 byPrincipalCommissioner,CIT-1,Rajkot.Afterpassingofaforesaidorderanassessment iscompetedU/s.143(3)r.w.s.263oftheact,determiningtheassessedincomeasincome ITANo.63/Rjt/2022 A.Y.2017-18 2 assessedU/s143(3)oftheact.Asnoadverseinterferencewasdrawnwhileframingthe reassessment,Ihumblyrequestyourhonourtokindlyallowmetowithdrawtheappeal filedinITA-63/RJT/2022&oblige. 3.Thus,inviewoftheabovesubmissionmadebytheassessee,expressing hiswillingnessinnotproceedingwiththeappeal,andnoobjectionfromtheLd. D.R.atthetimeofhearingofthematter,theappealpreferredbytheassesseeis dismissedaswithdrawn. 4.Intheresult,theappealpreferredbytheassesseeisdismissedas withdrawn. OrderpronouncedintheCourton29/11/2023atAhmedabad. Sd/-Sd/- (TRSENTHILKUMAR)(WASEEMAHMED) JUDICIALMEMBERACCOUNTANTMEMBER (TrueCopy) Ahmedabad;Dated29/11/2023 Manish,Sr.PSTRUECOPY