IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, D BENCH, MUMBAI. BEFORE SHRI D.K.AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND PRAMOD KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A NO.6312/ MUM/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07 RACHNA IRON & STEEL P.LTD. .. APPELLANT 83, MITTAL TOWER A WING, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI-21. PA NO.AAACB 2020 L VS ITO 3(3)(1) .. RESPONDEN T MUMBAI. APPEARANCES: NONE, FOR THE APPELLANT C.G.K. NAIR , FOR THE RESPONDENT DATE OF HEARING : 4.1.2012 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 31-1-2012 O R D E R PER PRAMOD KUMAR: 1. THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AG AINST THE ORDER DATED 5.4.2010 OF THE CIT(A)-7, MUMBAI, IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMEN T UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006- 07. 2. THE HEARING IN THIS CASE WAS FIXED ON 2.11.2011. AS THE BENCH DID NOT FUNCTION ON THAT DAY, THE HEARING WAS ADJOURNED TO 4.1.2012 AND INFORMED THE PARTIES THROUGH NOTICE BOARD. HOWEVER, WHEN ON 4.1 .2012, THE MATTER WAS CALLED ON FOR HEARING, NO ONE WAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE A SSESSEE NOR WAS ANY APPLICATION I.T.A NO.6312/ MUM/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07 2 FOR ADJOURNMENT FILED. FROM THE ABOVE, IT IS INFER RED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING ITS APPEAL BEFORE THE TRI BUNAL. ACCORDINGLY, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE ITAT DELHI IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT LTD., 38 ITD 320. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF P ROSECUTION. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 1 ST JANUARY, 2012 SD/- (D.K.AGARWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER SD/- (PRAMOD KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED 31 ST JANUARY, 2012 PARIDA COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),7, MUMBAI 4. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,3, MUMBAI 5. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, BENCH D MUMBAI //TRUE COPY// BY ORDER ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI