VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR JH HKKXPUN] YS[KK LNL; ,OA JH YFYR DQEKJ] U;KF;D LN L; DS LE{K BEFORE:SHRI BHAGCHAND, AM & SHRI LALIET KUMAR, J M VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 639/JP/2014 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11 THE ACIT CIRCLE- 2 ALWAR CUKE VS. M/S. BABA NURSING DAS BUILDCON (P) LTD. SP-33A, INDUSTRIAL AREA, NEEMRANA ALWAR LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO .: AACCB 8728 R VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY : SHRI G.R. PARIKH, JCIT -DR FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI P.C. PARWAL, CA LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 03/06/2016 ?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 03 /06/2016 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER BHAGCHAND, AM THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST T HE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A), ALWAR DATED 23-07-2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT Y EAR 2010-11 WHEREIN THE REVENUE RAISED FOLLOWING GROUND:- THAT THE LD. CIT(A), ALWAR HAS ERRED IN LAW AS WEL L AS ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN RESTRICT ING THE DISALLOWANCE OF RS. 33,77,795/- TO RS. 3,33,034/- M ADE BY THE AO WITHOUT APPRECIATING THE FACTS OF THE CASE. ITA NO. 639/JP/2014 THE ACIT, CIRCLE- 2, ALWAR VS. M/S. BABA NURSING DA S BUILDCON (P) LTD. , ALWAR . 2 2.2 WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL CONTENTIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIALS AVAILABLE ON RECORD. IT IS OBSERVED THAT THE DEMAND / TAX EFFECT IN THE REVENUES APPEAL IN QUESTION IS BELOW RS. 10.00 LA CS . UNDER THE POWERS VESTED BY SEC. 268A(1) OF THE I T ACT, CBDT HAS REC ENTLY ISSUED CIRCULARNO.21 OF 2015 DATED 10.12.2015(F NO. 279/MI SC. 142/2007-ITJ(PT) INSTRUCTING THE AUTHORITIES BELOW DEPARTMENTAL APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE FILED BEFORE ITAT WHERE THE DEMAND/TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED RS.10 LACS. THE C IRCULAR IS SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED TO BE APPLICABLE FOR ALL PEN DING APPEALS. 2.3 SUBJECT TO SOME EXCEPTIONS, IT IS FURTHER DIRE CTED BY CBDT THAT ALL THE DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS PENDING BEFORE ITAT WHERE THE DEMAND/TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN 10 LACS SHOULD BE EITHER WITHDR AWN OR NOT PRESSED BY THE DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVES. 2.4 THE PRESENT APPEAL IS NOT COVERED BY ANY EXCEP TIONS MENTIONED IN THE SAID CBDT CIRCULAR. SINCE THE TAX DEMAND IN DIS PUTE IN THIS DEPARTMENTAL APPEAL IS BELOW THE LIMIT SET OUT BY C BDT FOR THE APPEAL THE SAME IS NOT MAINTAINABLE IN VIEW OF FORE GOINGS. AC CORDINGLY THE APPEAL OF THE DEPARTMENT IS DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED/WITHD RAWN. ITA NO. 639/JP/2014 THE ACIT, CIRCLE- 2, ALWAR VS. M/S. BABA NURSING DA S BUILDCON (P) LTD. , ALWAR . 3 3.0 IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF REVENUE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 03 /06/2 016. SD/- SD/- YFYR DQEKJ HKKXPUN (LALIET KUMAR) (BHAGCHAND ) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 03/06/ 2016 *MISHRA VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSF'KR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- THE ACIT, CIRCLE- 2, ALWAR 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- M/S. BABA NURSING DAS BUILDCON (P) LTD., ALWAR 3. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY@ CIT(A). 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT, 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 639/JP/2014) VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR