IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH HKKXPUN] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI BHAGCHAND, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 640/JP/2017 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10. JHUNJHUN BALAJI MOTORS PVT. LTD. MANDAWA ROAD, SITSAR, JHUNJHUNU. CUKE VS. ACIT, CIRCLE- JHUNJHUNU. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN NO. AABCJ 9791 P VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY : SMT. POONAM RAI (DCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 07.12.2017. ?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 07/12/2017. VKNS'K@ ORDER PER SHRI BHAGCHAND ,AM. THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT (A)- III, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN DATED 22.09.2016 PERTAINING TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NO ONE APPEARED ON BEHAL F OF THE ASSESSEE. THERE IS ALSO NO APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT. THEREFORE, TH IS CONDUCT OF ASSESSEE SHOWS THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING ITS APPEAL. IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., (1991) 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE H ONBLE M.P. HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT ( 1997) 223 ITR 480 (MP), THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PRO SECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE STANDS DIS MISSED. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 07/12/201 7. 2 ITA NO. 640/JP/2017. JHUNJHUNU BALAJI MOTORS PVT. LTD. SD/ - ( HKKXPUN ( BHAGCHAND) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JAIPUR DATED:- 07/12/2017. POOJA/ VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSF'KR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. THE APPELLANT- JHUNJHUNU BALAJI MOTORS PVT. LTD . 2. THE RESPONDENT THE ACIT, CIRCLE- JHUNJHUNU. 3. THE CIT(A). 4. THE CIT, 5. THE DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 640/JP/2017) VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR