Siddharth Pansari (HUF), Kolkata V. I.T.O.,Ward-36(3), Kolkata

ITA 640/KOL/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3373 (ITAT-KOLKATA)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 10 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 25-02-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2015-2016
• Appeal Filed On: 29-03-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

ITA NO. 640/KOL/2019 ASS ESSMENT YEAR: 2015-2016 SIDDHARTH PANSARI (HUF) 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, C(SMC) BENCH, KOLKATA [VIRTUAL COURT HEARING] BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, VICE-PRESIDENT I.T.A. NO. 640/KOL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2015-2016 SIDDHARTH PANSARI,................................. ................................ APPELLANT PODDAR COURT, GATE NO. 3, 2 ND FLOOR, 18, RABINDRA SARANI, KOLKATA-700001 [PAN:AAPHS7167F] -VS.- INCOME TAX OFFICER,................................ ................................ RESPONDENT WARD-36(3), KOLKATA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN POORVA, 110, SHANTI PALLY, KOLKATA-700107 APPEARANCES BY: N O N E, APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE SMT. RANU BISWAS, ADDL. CIT, SR. D.R., APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE REVENUE DATE OF CONCLUDING THE HEARING : FEBRUARY 25, 2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCING THE ORDER : FEBRUARY 25, 2021 O R D E R THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAI NST THE ORDER OF LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-10, KOLKATA DA TED 27.02.2019 . 2. IN THIS CASE, SHRI S. JAYKISHAN, LD. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSESSEE HAS MOVED AN APPLICATION DATED 24.02.2021 SEEKING WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL ON THE GROUND THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS DECIDED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE INVOLVED IN THE SAID APPEAL UNDER THE DIREC T TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020. THE ASSESSEE HAS DULY FILED THE DECLARA TIONS IN FORM NO. 1 AND FORM NO. 2 AND THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY HAS ISSUED THE CERTIFICATE IN FORM NO. 3 AS PER SECTION 5(1) OF THE SCHEME ACCEPT ING THE ASSESSEES DECLARATION UNDER THE SAME SCHEME. ITA NO. 640/KOL/2019 ASS ESSMENT YEAR: 2015-2016 SIDDHARTH PANSARI (HUF) 2 3. KEEPING IN VIEW THESE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE INCLUDING ESPECIALLY THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS DULY COMP LIED WITH THE NECESSARY REQUIREMENTS UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020, T HE PERMISSION AS SOUGHT BY THE ASSESSEE IS GRANTED AND THIS APPEAL O F THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON FEBRUARY 25, 2021. SD/- (P.M. JAGTAP) VICE-PRESIDE NT KOLKATA, THE 25 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021 COPIES TO : (1) SIDDHARTH PANSARI, PODDAR COURT, GATE NO. 3, 2 ND FLOOR, 18, RABINDRA SARANI, KOLKATA-700001 (2) INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-36(3), KOLKATA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN POORVA, 110, SHANTI PALLY, KOLKATA-700107 (3) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-10, KOLK ATA; (4) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- , (5) THE DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (6) GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA LAHA/SR. P.S.