IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “SMC” DELHI BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A No.644/DEL/2023 Assessment Year 2019-20 Pawan Dhir Eye Institute and Research Centre, Bhiwani. v. ITO, Ward-1, Bhiwani. TAN/PAN: AAFAP6702J (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. Respondent by: Shri Om Parkash, Sr.DR Date of hearing: 24 04 2023 Date of pronouncement: 24 04 2023 O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, A.M.: The capt i oned appe al has been fi l ed b y t he Assessee agai nst th e orde r of the C o mmi ssi oner of I nco me Ta x ( Appeals), NFA C, Del hi ( ‘C I T(A ) ’ i n s hort) dat ed 11. 01. 2023 ari si ng f r o m the assessment or der dat ed 08.0 2.2 021 passe d b y t he Assessi ng Of fi cer ( AO) under Secti on 143( 3) of t he Inco me Tax Act, 1961 (t he Act ) concer ni ng AY 2019- 20. 2. The gr ou nds of appeal r ai sed b y the assessee reads as under: 1 . Th at on t h e f a c t s a n d c ir c um s t a n c e s o f th e c a s e an d i n l aw , t h e L d. C I T (A ) a n d t h e L d. A O , h av e w r o ng l y d e n ie d e x e m pt i o n W s 1 1 ( 1 )( a ) o f t h e A c t i n v i o l at i o n o f 1 s t p r ov i s o t o s e c t i o n 1 2A (2 ) of t h e A c t a nd p ar a 8 ( 3 ) o f t h e C B D T C i r c u l a r N o 1 o f 2 0 15 . B e c au s e a s p e r p r o v i s i on of t h e 1 s t pr ov i s o t o s e c t i on 1 2 A (2 ) o f t h e A c t a s I.T.A No.644/Del/2023 2 e x p l ai n e d v i de p a r a 8 (3 ) o f C B D T c i r c u la r , t he a p p ell a n t i s e l i g i bl e f o r e x e m pt i o n. 2 . T h a t on t h e f a c t s an d c i r c u m s t a nc e s of t h e c a s e a nd i n l a w , t he Ld . C I T ( A ) ha s e r r e d i n d i s m i s s i n g t h e a pp e al w i t h ou t a d j u d i c at i n g g r o u n d N o 4 a nd 5 o f t h e ap pe a l , w h i l e h o l di n g th a t, " Th e s e g r ou n d s a r e g e n e r a l i n n at u r e , n o s e pa r a t e a d j ud i c at i o n i s r e q u i r e d . " 3 . T h at t he a p pe l l an t c r a v e s l e a v e t o add, am e n d , mo d i fy , r e s c i n d, s u p pl e m e n t , or al t e r a n y of t h e g r ou n ds s t at e d h e r ei na bo v e b e f o r e o r a t th e t i m e o f he a r i ng . 4 . T h a t on t h e f a c t s an d c i r c u m s t a nc e s of t h e c a s e a nd i n l a w , t he Ld . C I T ( A ) h as e r r e d i n d i s m i s s i ng a p pe a l a g ai n s t as s e s s m e n t or d e r d t . 0 8. 0 2 . 20 2 1 , w h e r e by t he Ld . A s s e s s i ng O f f i c e r , v i o la t i n g p r o v i s io n s o f s e c t io n 2 (4 5 ) r e a d w i t h s e c t i o n 5 o f t he I n c o m e T ax A c t , h a s a s s e s s e d t h e a pp e l l an t 's gr os s r e c e i p t R s . 8 , 51 , 7 9 0 / - as i t s t o ta l i n c o m e . A s s u c h , t h e as s e s s m e n t o r de r da t e d 08 . 0 2 . 2 0 2 1 a n d t h e i m p u gn e d a p p e l l a t e o r d e r dt . 1 1. 0 1. 2 0 23 ar e b ad i n la w a n d d e s e r v e t o b e s e t a s i de / q u as h e d . 5 . T h a t on t h e f a c t s an d c i r c u m s t a nc e s of t h e c a s e a nd i n l a w , t he Ld . C I T ( A ) h a s e r r e d i n d i s m i s s i ng g r ou n d N o . 1 o f th e a pp e al a ga i n s t t h e Ld . A O ' s o r d e r d i s a l l ow i ng e nt i r e e x pe ns e s at R s . 7 , 33 , 8 4 8 / - i nc u r r e d f o r c ha r i t ab l e p u r po s e de f i n e d u/ s . 2 (1 5 ) of t he A c t , i r r e l e v a nt l y h o l d i n g t h a t t he a p pe l l a nt i s e l igi b l e f o r c l ai m of e x e m p t i on on l y w i t h e f f e c t f r om t h e A s s e s s m e n t Ye a r 2 0 20 - 2 1 . ” 3. When t he mat t er was call ed for hear ing, t he l d. c ouns el for the assessee point ed out t hat as per the grou nds of appeal, the assessee has t wo f old object io ns; • f irst l y, the benefi t of Secti ons 11 and 12 o ught to have been gi ven t o t he assessee when t he assessment in que sti on was pendi ng at the t i me of re gi st rati on granted under Sect ion 12A r. w. Secti on 12AA of the Act al bei t in t he subse quent assessment year 2019- 20; • secondl y, on me ri t s, t he assessee has i ncurr ed expenses of Rs. 7, 33, 848/ - f or carr yi ng out chari table act ivi t ies agai nst t he gr oss r ecei pts of Rs. 8, 51, 790/ -. I.T.A No.644/Del/2023 3 3. 1 The l d. counsel t hus poi nted out t hat not wit hsta ndi ng t he denial of be nef it under Sect io ns 11 and 12, the expe nses incur r ed need t o be set of f agai nst t he gr oss r eceipt s t o det er mi ne t he real inco me for t axati on pur p ose. 4. I n t he course of f urt her inquiri es and discussion at t he t i me of heari ng, the l d. counsel conce ded t hat t he rel evant grounds relatabl e t o fir st i ssue t owar ds avai labil i t y of benefi ts under Secti ons 11 and 12 wit hout regist rat i on of Tr ust in r el at ion t o Assess ment Year 2019- 20 in quest ion i s not pr essed a nd theref ore, nee d not be adj udi cate d. 5. I n t he li ght of t he concessi on gi ven on behal f of the assessee, t he onl y quest ion t hat re mai ns for adj udicati on is whet her the Reve nue Aut hori t ies were just if ied i n taxi ng t he gr oss receipt s i gnor ing t he c orr es pondi ng expenses i ncu rred i n the cour se of char i tabl e acti vi ti es. We st rai ght away f i nd for ce i n the pl ea of the assessee for all owabi l it y of expe ndi t ur e i n relati on t o r ecei pts generate d i n t he cour se of chari ta bl e acti vi ti es not wit hst andi ng no n avai labil i t y o f re gist rati on unde r Secti on 12A f or t he Assess me nt Year 2019- 20 i n quest i on. We do not see an y rat i onal e i n t he act ion of t he Reve nue i n den yi ng the expendit ure incur red f or generati ng t he c orr espondi ng receipt on fir st pri ncipl es. We t her ef or e, consi der i t expedie nt t o rest ore t he i ssue bac k to t he fi le of t he Assessing Offi cer f or ver if icat ion of expenses and de pre ci at i on al l owances i ncu rre d, i f consi dered ne cessar y. T he ex penses and all owances incurre d f or the pur poses of chari tabl e acti vi ti es shal l be al l owe d whe re it is found t o ha ve been i ncur red f or ca rr yi ng out chari ta bl e I.T.A No.644/Del/2023 4 acti vi ti es. 6. The or der of t he CIT( A) is set asi de acc or di ngl y a nd t he issue i s rest ored to t he fi le of the Assessi ng Of ficer f or adj udi cati on in t er ms of the di rect i o ns not ed abo ve. N eedl ess t o sa y, a reasonabl e opport u nit y s hal l be given t o the assessee whil e deter mi ni ng the issue. 7. I n the result , the appeal of t he assessee i s al lowed f or stati sti cal purpose s. Order dictated and pronounced in the open Court on 24/04/2023. Sd/- Sd/- [KUL BHARAT] [PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: /04/2023 Prabhat