DCIT CENT. CIR. 7(1), MUMBAI V. RAVI MOHAN GEHI, MUMBAI

ITA 6453/MUM/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6201 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 6 month(s) 16 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 20-05-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 03-11-2016
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: JYOTILAKSHMI NAYAK
• Keywords: Tax effect
• Section: 6

Judgement Text

IN THE INC OME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C. N. PRASAD, JM & SHRI S . RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM ./ I.T.A. NO . 6453 / MUM/ 2016 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 20 11 - 12 ) DC IT CC 7 (1) R. NO. 653 , 6 ST FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, M. K. ROAD, MUMBAI - 400 020 / VS. RAVI MOHAN GEHI, FLAT NO. 220, TRIVENI APARTMENT, CADELL ROAD, MUMBAI - 400 016 ./ ./ PAN NO. AAEFR 8176 J ( / APPELLANT ) : ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI JYOTI LAKSHMI NAYAK, DR / RESPONDENTBY : SHRI PRADIP KAPASI , AR / DATE OF HEARING : 12.03. 2020 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 20.05.2020 / O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. COMMIS S IONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) - 49 IN 2 I.T.A. NO. 6453 /MUM/201 6 RAVI MOHAN GEHI SHORT REFERRED AS LD. CIT(A) , MUMBAI, DATED 12.08.2016 FOR A SSESSMENT YEAR (IN SHORT A Y ) 20 11 - 12 . 2 . AT THE OUTSET, WE NOTICE THAT THE TAX EFFECT OF THE RELIEF GRANTED BY THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) IS BELOW RS. 50 LACS AND AS PER CIRCULAR NO.17 OF 2019 DATED 08.08.2019 ISSUED BY THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES (CBDT), DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOV ERNMENT OF INDIA, THE CBDT HAS REVISED THE MONETARY LIMIT FOR FILING APPEALS BEFORE THE ITAT FROM THE EXISTING LIMIT OF RS. 20 LACS TO RS. 50 LACS. 3 . THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (DR) FAIRLY CONCEDED THAT THIS APPEAL IS COVERED BY THE AFORESAID CI RCULAR ISSUED BY THE CBDT. THE LD. DR SUBMITTED THAT IN CASE THIS APPEAL FALLS IN THE EXCEPTIONAL CASE, THE APPEAL MAY BE ALLOWED TO RECALL. 4 . WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE ORDER OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AND THE GROUNDS OF APPEALS. WE F IND THAT THE TAX EFFECT IN THE ABOVE REFERRED APPEAL IS LESS THAN RS. 50 LACS. ACCORDINGLY, WE DISMISS THE AFORESAID APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE AS NOT MAINTAINABLE/WITHDRAWN. 3 I.T.A. NO. 6453 /MUM/201 6 RAVI MOHAN GEHI 5. IN THE NET RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE STA NDS DISMISSED . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 20 TH MAY , 20 20 . SD/ - SD/ - ( C. N. PRASAD ) (S. RIFAUR RAHMAN ) / JUDICIAL MEMBER / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI ; DATED : 20 . 05 .2020 SR.PS . DK / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT 3. ( ) / THE CIT(A) 4. / CIT - CONCERNED 5. , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. / GUARD F I LE / BY ORDER, . / (DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI