SH.RAKESH KUMAR, SARDULGARH V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MANSA

ITA 646/ASR/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 104 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6822 (ITAT-AMRITSAR)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 11 month(s) 12 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 07-12-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 25-12-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. M.L. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A No. 646/ASR/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010-11) Rakesh Kumar S/o Lachman Dass, Airtel Tower Wali Gali, Sirsa Road, Sardulgarh. [PAN: AHHPK1430A] (Assessee) Vs. ITO, Ward 1(5), Mansa (Revenue) Assessee by None Revenue by Sh. S. M. Surendranath, D.R. Date of Hearing 06.12.2021 Date of Pronouncement 08 .12.2021 ORDER Per Bench: The appeal filed by the assessee feeling aggrieved by the order of Ld. CIT(A), dated 19.09.2018 for A.Y. 2010-11. 2. At the outset, the ld. AR of the assessee has requested for withdrawal of this appeal filed by assessee and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute I.T.A No. 646/ASR/2018 2 relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the ”Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed. 3. Learned DR has no objection. 4. In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal. 5. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 08/12/2021. Sd/- Sd/- (MAHAVIR PRASAD) (DR. M.L. MEENA) JUDICIAL MEMBER True Copy ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated 08/12/2021 Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT True Copy By Order