IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI SMC-1 BENCH: NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING ) BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.6512/DEL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 MEENAKSHI JAIN, C/O-KAPIL GOEL, ADVOCATE, F-26/124, SECTOR-07, ROHINI, NEW DELHI-110085. PAN-AFTPJ1096B VS ITO, WARD-71(3), NEW DELHI. APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY SH.SANDEEP GOEL, ADVOCATE RESPONDENT BY SH.R.K.GUPTA, SR.DR DATE OF HEARING 22.06.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 22.06.2021 ORDER PER KUL BHARAT, JM : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMEN T YEAR 2014-15 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A)-28, NEW DE LHI DATED 21.05.2019. 2. LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, VIDE ITS LETTER DA TED 31.03.2021, RECEIVED THROUGH EMAIL, HAS REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWA L OF THE APPEAL FILED BY HIM AND STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTL E THE DISPUTE RELATING TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSI DERATION UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020. A CERTIFICATE TO T HIS EFFECT UNDER SECTION 5(1) OF THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 H AS ALSO BEEN FILED. 3. LEARNED SENIOR DR HAS NO OBJECTION. 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, I ACCEPT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ABOVE DECISION WAS PRONOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRT UAL HEARING IN THE PRESENCE OF BOTH THE PARTIES ON 22 ND JUNE, 2021. SD/- (KUL BHARAT) JUDICIAL MEMBER *AMIT KUMAR* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI