M/S SHYOJI RAM PRAJAPAT HUF, KISHANGARH V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, KISHANGRAH

ITA 652/JPR/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4957 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 8 month(s) 29 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 09-02-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 11-05-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MONISHA CHOUDHARY ACIT

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S,B JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SING H YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 652 & 653/JP/2018 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09 & 2010-11 M/S SHYOJI RAM PRAJAPAT, HUF VILLAGE-SANWATSAR, MADANGANJ, KISHANGARH. CUKE VS. THE ITO, WARD-2, KISHANGARH . LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO. AAZHS 3950 E VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 651/JP/2018 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-08 M/S SHYOJI RAM PRAJAPAT, HUF VILLAGE-SANWATSAR, MADANGANJ, KISHANGARH. CUKE VS. THE ITO, WARD-1, KISHANGARH. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO. AAZHS 3950 E VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI DEVANG GARGIEYA (ADV.) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY (ACIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 05/02/2021 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 09/02/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER ITA NO. 651 TO 653/JP/2018 M/S SHYOJI RAM PRAJAPAT HUF VS. ITO 2 PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THE PRESENT APPEALS HAVE BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSE E AGAINST THE ORDERS OF CIT(A), AJMER ALL DATED 01.02.2018 FOR TH E ASSESSMENT YEARS 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2010-11 RESPECTIVELY. 2. HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDE O CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEM IC. 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLI CATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THESE APPEALS. THE CONTENTION IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER:- HON'BLE SIR, IN THIS CONNECTION IT IS SUBMITTED THAT AS INSTRUCT ED BY THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CLIENT, IT IS HEREBY PRAYED THAT THE ABOV E APPEAL PLEASE BE TREATED AS WITHDRAWN WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT IN AS MU CH AS THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED FOR SETTLEMENT UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME-2020. A FORMAL ORDER TO THIS EFFECT MAY KINDLY BE PASSED AT AN EARLY DATE AND OBLIGE. THANKING YOU. YOURS FAITHFULLY, FOR MAHENDRA GARGIEYA & ASSOCIATES. 4. THE LD. DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. ITA NO. 651 TO 653/JP/2018 M/S SHYOJI RAM PRAJAPAT HUF VS. ITO 3 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDE R VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THESE APPEALS. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THESE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 09/02/2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XKSLKBZ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 09/02/2021. * SANTOSH. VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- M/S SHYOJI RAM PRAJAPAT, HUF, KISHANGARH. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO, WARD-1, KISHANGARH. ITO, WARD-2, KISHANGARH. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO. 651 TO 653/JP/2018} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR