Foundation For Peace and Compassionate Leadership, Pune V. CIT (Exemption)-Pune, Pune

ITA 652/PUN/2024

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 100 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0714 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 24 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 25-07-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2022-2023
• Appeal Filed On: 01-04-2024
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Charitable institution
• Section: 80G

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH ‘A’, PUNE BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.652/PUN/2024 Foundation for Peace and Compassionate Leadership, Oshiana, 8A, Sr.88/1/1/6/8, Veerabhadra Nagar, Baner, Pune 411045, Maharashtra PAN : AADCF8615L .......अपीलाथ / Appellant बनाम / V/s. CIT(Exemption), Pune ...... यथ / Respondent Assessee by : Shri M.R. Sahu Revenue by : Shri Keyur Patel, CIT-DR स ु नवाई क तार ख / Date of Hearing : 11.07.2024 घोषणा क तार ख / Date of Pronouncement : 26.07.2024 आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM: This is an appeal filed by the assessee trust directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Pune dated 27.03.2024 denying grant of approval u/s.80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’). 2. The appellant is a trust registered u/s.12AB(1)(b) of the Act. It had applied for approval under clause (iii) of the first proviso to sub- section (5) of section 80G. The trust was granted provisional approval vide order dated 02.10.2021 valid upto the A.Y. 2026-27. Subsequently, the appellant trust filed application in Form No. 10AB under clause (iii) 2 ITA No.652/PUN/2024 Foundation for Peace and Compassionate Leadership of first provision to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act on 29.09.2023. The said application came to be rejected vide impugned order dated 27.03.2024 on the ground that the appellant trust had not filed the application within the prescribed time limit under clause (iii) of first provision to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act. According to the ld. CIT(Exemptions), the appellant trust was required to file the application in Form No.10AB for regular approval within six months from the date of provisional approval, i.e. on or before 30.06.2022, or as extended upto 30.09.2022 as per the CBDT Circular No.08/2022 dated 31.03.2022 or within period of six months from the date of commencement of activities, i.e. 01.01.2022 whichever is earlier. Since the activities of the trust was already commenced as on the date of provisional approval, i.e. on 01.11.2022. Since the present application in Form No.10AB was filed by the appellant trust only on 29.09.2023. Therefore, the ld. CIT(Exemptions) denied the grant of approval on the grounds of delay. 3. Being aggrieved, the appellant trust is in appeal before us in the present appeal. 4. The ld. AR submits that the provisional approval which was granted to the appellant trust vide order dated 02.10.2021 is valid upto March, 2025 and the appellant trust is only allowed to file application in Form No.10AB, six months before its expiry. Thus, she submits that since the application was filed on 29.09.2023, the application was well within time and therefore the ld. CIT(Exemptions) cannot reject the grant of approval on the ground of delay. 5. On the other hand, the ld. Sr. DR supporting the order of CIT(Exemptions) submits that no interference by this Tribunal is called for. 3 ITA No.652/PUN/2024 Foundation for Peace and Compassionate Leadership 6. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The issue that arises for our consideration is to determine the question whether there is a delay in filing Form No.10AB in terms of provisions of clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as extended by CBDT Circulars. . The appellant trust was formed with the charitable objects, applied for provisional approval which was granted on 02.10.2021 with validity upto March, 2026. In the meanwhile the appellant trust commenced its activities on 01.01.2022. The appellant trust applied for regular approval in Form 10AB on 29.09.2023. The ld. CIT(Exemptions) has denied the grant of regular approval as the application was filed belatedly. According to the ld. CIT(Exemptions) application for grant of regular approval should have been filed on or before 30.06.2022, since the appellant trust has filed the application on 29.09.2023, the application is barred by limitation, accordingly denied the grant of approval u/s.80G(5)(iii) of the Act. 7. The contention of the ld. Counsel for the appellant trust that application was filed within time limits prescribed, as extended by the CBDT in its Circular No.06/2023, dated 24.05.2023 cannot be acceded for the reason that CBDT vide Circular No.6 had not extended the time limit prescribed under clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. 8. We further find the decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Sri Nrisimha Priya Charitable Trust Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes (2024) 161 taxmann.com 209 (Madras) which was relied on by the appellant trust also does not come to the aid of the appellant trust, in as much as, the Hon’ble High Court merely declared ultravires the CBDT Circular No.6/2023 dated 24.05.2023, which means that the said circular ceased to exist. In any event, the said circular had not extended 4 ITA No.652/PUN/2024 Foundation for Peace and Compassionate Leadership the time limits prescribed under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 9. We further find that the CBDT Circular No.07/2024 dated 25.04.2024 had extended the time limits prescribed under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act till 30.06.2024. However, since the ld.CIT(Exemptions) had already passed the order before issuance of this circular, the present application cannot be said to be within the prescribed time limit as extended by the aforesaid CBDT circular. However, we clarify that the appellant trust is not estopped from filing a fresh application within the extended time limit of 30.06.2024 by virtue of the same circular. 10. It is settled position of law that in the absence of express powers conferred by the statute, the authorities have no power to condone the delay keeping in view the salutary principle of law, and in view of the above discussion, we are of the view that the application filed by the appellant trust is not within the time limits prescribed under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act. Therefore, we are of the opinion that that CIT(Exemptions) was justified in rejecting the grant of approval u/s.80G of the Act on the grounds of delay. 11. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 26 th July, 2024. Sd/- Sd/- VINAY BHAMORE INTURI RAMA RAO JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER प ु णे / Pune; दनांक / Dated : 26 th July, 2024 Satish 5 ITA No.652/PUN/2024 Foundation for Peace and Compassionate Leadership आदेश क त!ल"प अ#े"षत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant; 2. यथ / The Respondent; 3. The Pr.CIT concerned 4. DR, ITAT, ‘A’ Bench, Pune 5. गाड& फाईल / Guard file. आदेशान ु सार / BY ORDER, //स या"पत त// True Copy// व(र)ठ नजी स,चव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपील य अ,धकरण, प ु णे / ITAT, Pune