IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.C.SHARMA, AM & SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM ITA NO. 6565/MUM/2018 ( ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2013-14) I.T.O.-25(1)(1), MUMBAI. VS. SANDEEP S. DAGARIA, AMRIT DIAMOND HOUSE BUILDING, TATA ROAD NO.-142, OPERA HOUSE, MUMBAI- 400004. PAN/GIR NO.AAFHV 8772 F (APPELLANT ) .. (RESPONDENT ) REVENUE BY SHRI KUMAR PADMAPANI BORA (SR.DR) ASSESSEE BY NONE DATE OF HEARING 09/12/2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 10/12/2019 / O R D E R PER: R.C. SHARMA, A.M. THIS IS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST TH E ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-45, MUMBAI DATED 12/07/2018 FOR THE A.Y. 200 9-10 IN THE MATTER OF ORDER PASSED U/S 144 R.W.S. 147 OF THE INCOME TA X ACT, 1961 (IN SHORT, THE ACT). 2. NO BODY APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE IN SP ITE OF SERVICE OF NOTICE, THEREFORE, THE BENCH DECIDED TO DISPOSE OFF THE APPEAL AFTER HEARING THE LD. DR AND CONSIDERING THE MATERIAL PLA CED ON RECORD. 3. AT THE OUTSET, THE LD DR HAS FAIRLY AGREED THAT THE TAX EFFECT IN THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS LESS THAN RS. 50.00 LACS. ITA NO. 6565/MUM/2018 ITO VS SANDEEP S DAGARIA 2 4. WE HAVE CONSIDERED THE RIVAL CONTENTIONS AND CAR EFULLY GONE THROUGH THE ORDERS OF THE AUTHORITIES BELOW AND FOU ND THAT THE TAX EFFECT IN THIS APPEAL IS NOT EXCEEDING THE MONETARY LIMIT AS REVISED BY THE CBDT VIDE CIRCULAR DATED 08.08.2019 FOR THE PURPOSE OF F ILING OF APPEAL BY THE DEPARTMENT BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FROM RS. 20,00,000/- TO RS. 50,00,000/-. FOR READY REFERENC E, WE REPRODUCE THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 17 OF 2019 DATED 08.08.2019 AS UN DER:- FURTHER ENHANCEMENT OF MONETARY LIMITS FOR FILING O F APPEALS BY THE DEPARTMENT BEFORE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , HIGH COURTS AND SLPS/APPEALS BEFORE SUPREME COURT - AMEN DMENT TO CIRCULAR 3 OF 2018 - MEASURES FOR REDUCING LITIGATI ON. CIRCULAR NO. 3/2018 DATED 11TH JULY 2018 HAS BEEN R EPLACED BY CIRCULAR NO. 17/2019 DATED 8TH AUGUST 2019 TO ENHAN CE MONETARY LIMITS FOR FILING OF APPEALS BY THE DEPARTMENT BEFO RE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, HIGH COURTS AND SLPS/APPEALS BE FORE SUPREME COURT FOR REDUCING LITIGATION. APPEALS/SLPS IN INCOME- TAX MATTERS MONETARY LIMIT (RS.) (PREVIOUS LIMIT) MONETARY LIMIT (RS.) (REVISED LIMIT) BEFORE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 20,00,000 50,00,000 BEFORE HIGH COURT 50,00,000 1,00,00,000 BEFORE SUPREME COURT 1,00,00,000 2,00,00,000 THE ASSESSING OFFICER SHALL CALCULATE THE TAX EFFEC T SEPARATELY FOR EVERY ASSESSMENT YEAR IN RESPECT OF THE DISPUTED IS SUES IN THE CASE OF EVERY ASSESSEE. IF, IN THE CASE OF AN ASSES SEE, THE DISPUTED ISSUES ARISE IN MORE THAN ONE ASSESSMENT Y EAR, APPEAL CAN BE FILED IN RESPECT OF SUCH ASSESSMENT YEAR OR YEARS IN WHICH THE TAX EFFECT IN RESPECT OF THE DISPUTED ISSUES EX CEEDS THE MONETARY LIMIT. NO APPEAL SHALL BE FILED IN RESPECT OF AN ASSESSMENT YEAR OR YEARS IN WHICH THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN THE MONETARY LIMIT. FURTHER, EVEN IN THE CASE OF COMPOSITE ORDER OF ANY HIGH COURT OR APPELLATE AUTHORITY WHICH INVOLVES MORE THAN ONE AS SESSMENT YEAR ITA NO. 6565/MUM/2018 ITO VS SANDEEP S DAGARIA 3 AND COMMON ISSUES IN MORE THAN ONE ASSESSMENT YEAR, NO APPEAL SHALL BE FILED IN RESPECT OF AN ASSESSMENT YEAR OR YEARS IN WHICH THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN THE MONETARY LIMIT. IN CASE WHERE A COMPOSITE ORDER/ JUDGMENT INVOLVES MORE THAN ONE ASSESSEE, EACH ASSESSEE SHALL BE DEALT WITH SEP ARATELY. 5. IT IS ALSO RELEVANT TO MENTION HERE THAT THIS AP PEAL IS NOT COVERED BY ANY OF THE EXCEPTIONS MENTIONED IN THE SAID CIRC ULAR SO AS TO NOT DISMISSING THE SAME ON THE GROUND OF LOW TAX EFFECT . ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE DEPARTMENT IS NOT MAINTAINABLE BEING MONETARY LIMIT IS LESS THAN/NOT EXCEEDING RS. 50,00,000/-. 6. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSE D. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 10 TH DECEMBER, 2019. SD/- (VIKAS AWASTHY) SD/- (R.C.SHARMA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI; DATED 10/12/2019 *RANJAN COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER, (ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, MUMBAI 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(A), MUMBAI. 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE. //TRUE COPY//