IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “D”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.6599/M/2019 Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. Ramesh Nanji Gala, 1204, Jai Chamunda Carter Road Cross No.5, Green Hotel, Borivali East, Mumbai – 400 066 PAN: AABPG1693A Vs. ACIT 21(3), Room No.209, 2 nd Floor Piramal Chambers, Lalbaug, Mumbai – 400 012 (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : None Revenue by : Dr. Arvind Sontakke, D.R. Date of Hearing : 08.11.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 16.11.2021 O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member: The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 06.08.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as the CIT(A)] relevant to assessment year 2012-13. 2. None has appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the assessee filed a letter dated 14.06.2021 requesting the Bench to allow the assessee to voluntarily withdraw the appeal as the assessee has gone into Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and also submitted that form No.3 which has already been issued. ITA No.6599/M/2019 M/s. Ramesh Nanji Gala 2 3. The Ld. D.R. fairly conceded to the withdrawal of the appeal. 4. Accordingly, we are inclined to dismiss the appeal of the assessee. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 16.11.2021. Sd/- Sd/- (Amarjit Singh) (Rajesh Kumar) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai, Dated: 16.11.2021. * Kishore, Sr. P.S. Copy to: The Appellant The Respondent The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai The CIT (A) Concerned, Mumbai The DR Concerned Bench //True Copy// [ By Order Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.