IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI DELHI DELHI FRIDAY BENCH FRIDAY BENCH FRIDAY BENCH FRIDAY BENCH A AA A : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ,, , VICE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SHRI SHRI SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY K. NARASIMHA CHARY K. NARASIMHA CHARY K. NARASIMHA CHARY , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. ITA NO. ITA NO. ITA NO. 6610 6610 6610 6610 /DEL/201 /DEL/201 /DEL/201 /DEL/201 9 99 9 ASSESSMENT YEAR ASSESSMENT YEAR ASSESSMENT YEAR ASSESSMENT YEAR : : : : 20 2020 20 1 11 1 1 11 1 - -- - 12 1212 12 SHRI RAMAVTAR, SHRI RAMAVTAR, SHRI RAMAVTAR, SHRI RAMAVTAR, R RR R/O 1298, SECTOR /O 1298, SECTOR /O 1298, SECTOR /O 1298, SECTOR- -- -6, 6,6, 6, BAHADURGARH, BAHADURGARH, BAHADURGARH, BAHADURGARH, JHAJJAR JHAJJAR JHAJJAR JHAJJAR 124 507. 124 507. 124 507. 124 507. PAN : AANHR4369A. PAN : AANHR4369A. PAN : AANHR4369A. PAN : AANHR4369A. VS. VS. VS. VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD WARD WARD WARD- -- -5 55 5, ,, , ROHTAK. ROHTAK. ROHTAK. ROHTAK. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SHRI NAVEEN KUMAR GOYAL, CA. RESPONDENT BY : SHRI M. BARANWAL , SENIOR DR. DATE OF HEARING : 25.09 25.09 25.09 25.09.2020 .2020 .2020 .2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 25 2525 25.09 .09.09 .09.2020 .2020 .2020 .2020 ORDER ORDER ORDER ORDER PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU, , , , VP VPVP VP : :: : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEA R 2011-12 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A), ROHTA K DATED 28 TH JUNE, 2019. 2. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, VIDE EMAIL DATED 18 TH SEPTEMBER, 2020 HAS REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AND STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSM ENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 20 20. A CERTIFICATE TO THIS EFFECT UNDER SECTION 5(1) OF THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 HAS ALSO BEEN FILED. 3. LEARNED SENIOR DR HAS NO OBJECTION. ITA-6610/DEL/2019 2 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE ACCEPT THE REQUEST OF T HE ASSESSEE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED IN THE PRESENCE OF BOT H THE PARTIES ON CONCLUSION OF VIRTUAL HEARING ON 25 TH SEPTEMBER, 2020. SD/- SD/- ( (( ( K. K.K. K. NARASIMHA CHARY NARASIMHA CHARY NARASIMHA CHARY NARASIMHA CHARY ) )) ) (G.S. PANNU (G.S. PANNU (G.S. PANNU (G.S. PANNU ) )) ) JUDICIAL JUDICIAL JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VK. COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT : SHRI RAMAVTAR, R/O 1298, SECTOR SHRI RAMAVTAR, R/O 1298, SECTOR SHRI RAMAVTAR, R/O 1298, SECTOR SHRI RAMAVTAR, R/O 1298, SECTOR- -- -6, 6,6, 6, BAHADURGARH, JHAJJAR BAHADURGARH, JHAJJAR BAHADURGARH, JHAJJAR BAHADURGARH, JHAJJAR 124 507. 124 507. 124 507. 124 507. 2. RESPONDENT : INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- -- -5, ROHTAK. 5, ROHTAK. 5, ROHTAK. 5, ROHTAK. 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR