Smt. Divya Vedi, New Delhi V. DCIT, Faridabad

ITA 6631/DEL/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 115 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4847 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 10 month(s) 2 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 30-10-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 04-05-2017
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 28-12-2016
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: NIDHI SRIVASTAVA
• Section: 274; 132

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH B, NEW DELHI BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER DR. B. R. R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 6631/DEL./2016 : ASSTT. YEAR : 2010-11 SMT. DIVYA VEDI, RRA TAXINDIA, D-28, SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-I, NEW DELHI-110049 VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, FARIDABAD (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN NO. A A EPV8188Q ASSESSEE BY : SH. SOMIL AGGARWAL, ADV. REVENUE BY : MS. NIDHI SRIVASTAVA, CIT DR DATE OF HEAR ING: 03 . 10 .201 9 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 30 .10 .201 9 ORDER PER DR. B. R. R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-3, GURGAON DATED 30.11. 2016. 2. FOLLOWING GROUNDS HAVE BEEN RAISED BY THE ASSESS EE: 1. THAT HAVING REGARD TO THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANC ES OF THE CASE, LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FAC TS IN NOT DELETING THE PENALTY OF RS. 56,986/- FULLY, WHICH WAS LEVIED BY LD. A.O. AND THAT TOO WITHOUT ASSUMING JURISDICTION AS PER LAW AND WITHOUT APPRECIATING THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CAS E. 2. THAT HAVING REGARD TO THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCE S OF THE CASE, LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FAC TS IN CONFIRMING THE LEVY OF PENALTY U/S 271AAA, MORE SO WHEN PENALTY WAS INITIATED & LEVIED BY LD. A.O. ONL Y ON THE GROUND THAT MANNER OF INCOME FOR INVESTMENT IN JEWELLERY WAS NOT SUBSTANTIATED AND THUS, LD. CIT(A) HAS EXCEEDED THE JURISDICTION. ITA NO. 6631/DEL/2016 DIVYA VEDI 2 3. IN ANY VIEW OF THE MATTER AND IN ANY CASE, IMPOSITION OF PENALTY U/S 271AAA AND CONFIRMED BY LD. CIT(A) IS BAD IN LAW AND AGAINST THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. 3. THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 271AAA ARE AS UNDER: 271AAA. PENALTY WHERE SEARCH HAS BEEN INITIATED.(1) THE ASSESSING OFFICER MAY, NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING CONTAINED IN ANY OTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS ACT, DIRECT THAT, IN A CA SE WHERE SEARCH HAS BEEN INITIATED UNDER SECTION 132 ON OR AFTER THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2007, THE ASSESSEE SHALL PAY BY WAY OF PENA LTY, IN ADDITION TO TAX, IF ANY, PAYABLE BY HIM, A SUM COMPUT ED AT THE RATE OF TEN PER CENT OF THE UNDISCLOSED INCOME OF THE S PECIFIED PREVIOUS YEAR. (2) NOTHING CONTAINED IN SUB-SECTION (1) SHALL APPLY IF THE ASSESSEE, (I) IN THE COURSE OF THE SEARCH, IN A STATEM ENT UNDER SUB- SECTION (4) OF SECTION 132, ADMITS THE UNDISCLOSED INCOME AND SPECIFIES THE MANNER IN WHICH SUCH INCOME HAS BEEN DERIVED; (II) SUBSTANTIATES THE MANNER IN WHICH THE UNDISCL OSED INCOME WAS DERIVED; AND (III) PAYS THE TAX, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST, IF ANY, IN RESPECT OF THE UNDISCLOSED INCOME. (3) NO PENALTY UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CLAUSE (C) OF SUB -SECTION (1) OF SECTION 271 SHALL BE IMPOSED UPON THE ASSESSEE IN R ESPECT OF THE UNDISCLOSED INCOME REFERRED TO IN SUB-SECTION (1). (4) THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 274 AND 275 SHALL, SO FAR A S MAY BE, APPLY IN RELATION TO THE PENALTY REFERRED TO IN THIS SECTION. EXPLANATION.FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, (A) 'UNDISCLOSED INCOME' MEANS (I) ANY INCOME OF THE SPECIFIED PREVIOUS YEAR R EPRESENTED, EITHER WHOLLY OR PARTLY, BY ANY MONEY, BULLION, JEW ELLERY OR OTHER VALUABLE ARTICLE OR THING OR ANY ENTRY IN T HE BOOKS OF ACCOUNT OR OTHER DOCUMENTS OR TRANSACTIONS FOUND IN THE COURSE OF A SEARCH UNDER SECTION 132, WHICH HAS (A) NOT BEEN RECORDED ON OR BEFORE THE DAT E OF SEARCH IN THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNT OR OTHER DOCUMENTS ITA NO. 6631/DEL/2016 DIVYA VEDI 3 MAINTAINED IN THE NORMAL COURSE RELATING TO SUCH PREVIOUS YEAR; OR (B) OTHERWISE NOT BEEN DISCLOSED TO THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OR COMMISSIONER BEFORE THE DATE OF THE SEARCH. 4. IN THE INSTANT CASE, THE ASSESSING OFFICER LEVIE D AND THE LD. CIT (A) CONFIRMED THE PENALTY LEVIED BY THE ASSESSI NG OFFICER ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE ASSESSEE FAILED TO SUBSTANTIAT E THE MANNER IN WHICH THE INCOME WAS EARNED [5(V) OF THE PENALTY ORDER]. FROM THE RECORDS, WE FIND THAT THE ASSESSEE WHILE A NSWERING TO QUESTION NO. 5 POSED DURING THE SEARCH HAS EXPLAINE D THAT THE JEWELLERY BELONGS TO HER MINOR DAUGHTER AND MOTHER- IN-LAW. THE REVENUE HAS RELEASED THE JEWELLERY WORTH RS.11.21 L ACS OUT OF THE TOTAL JEWELLERY OF RS.15.10 LACS. THIS IS A CLA SSIFICATION OF RELEASING THE JEWELLERY AS PER THE BOARD INSTRUCTIO N AND LEVYING PENALTY ON THE VALUE OF THE PRECIOUS STONES STUDDED IN THE SAID JEWELLERY ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE ASSESSEE COULD NO T FULFILL THE CONDITIONS LAID DOWN IN THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 2 71AAA(2)(II). IN OUR OPINION, WHEN THE GOLD JEWELLERY IN WHICH TH E DIAMONDS WERE STUDDED HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT AS THE JEWELLERY RECEIVED AT THE TIME OF MARRIAGE OR OTHER OCCASION, THEN, IT CANNOT BE SAID THAT THE DIAMOND STUDDED IN THE SAID JEWELLERY WERE OUT OF THE UNDISCLOSED INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE. IT IS WELL SETTLED THAT THE ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS AND THE PENALTY ARE TWO DIFFERENT AND DISTINCT PROCEEDINGS AND THAT THE ADDITION MADE IN THE ASSESSMENT MAY BE RELEVANT BUT NOT A CO NCLUSIVE PROOF OF CONCEALMENT OF INCOME OR FURNISHING OF INA CCURATE PARTICULARS OF INCOME. THEREFORE, CONSIDERING THE T OTALITY OF THE PECULIAR FACTS OF THE PRESENT CASE, WE HEREBY DIREC T THAT THE PENALTY OF RS.56,986/- MADE BY THE ASSESSING OFFICE R BE OBLITERATED. ITA NO. 6631/DEL/2016 DIVYA VEDI 4 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 30/10/2019. SD/- SD/- (SUSHMA CHOWLA) (DR. B. R. R. KUMAR) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOU NTANT MEMBER DATED: 30/10/2019 *SUBODH* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITA NO. 6631/DEL/2016 DIVYA VEDI 5