Shri Kailash Garg, Indore V. Additional Director of Income Tax (Inv.), Indore

ITA 664/Ind/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9027 (ITAT-INDORE)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 4 month(s) 4 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 24-11-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Next Hearing Date: 18-11-2020
• Assessment Year: 2017-2018
• Appeal Filed On: 20-07-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

ANAND BANGUR & OTHERS 1 , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.658/IND/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2017-18 SHRI ANAND BANGUR UJJAIN / VS. ADIT(INVESTIGATION) INDORE (APPELLANT) (REVENUE ) P.A. NO. ABRPB5355M ITA NO.659/IND/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2017-18 SHRI ARPIT BANGUR UJJAIN / VS. ADIT(INVESTIGATION) INDORE (APPELLANT) (REVENUE ) P.A. NO. AKBPB2579C ITA NO.660/IND/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2017-18 SHRI VIJENDRA KUMAR SOOD UJJAIN / VS. ADIT(INVESTIGATION) INDORE (APPELLANT) (REVENUE ) P.A. NO. AJVPS6854L ITA NO.661/IND/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2017-18 SMT. BABITA GUPTA UJJAIN / VS. ADIT(INVESTIGATION) INDORE (APPELLANT) (REVENUE ) P.A. NO. AHLPG0222C ANAND BANGUR & OTHERS 2 ITA NO.662/IND/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2017-18 SHRI ROOP NARAYAN JHANWAR UJJAIN / VS. ADIT(INVESTIGATION) INDORE (APPELLANT) (REVENUE ) P.A. NO. A DDPJ4869J ITA NO.663/IND/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2017-18 SMT. ANITA JOSHI UJJAIN / VS. ADIT(INVESTIGATION) INDORE (APPELLANT) (REVENUE ) P.A. NO. AFGPJ7522M ITA NO.664/IND/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2017-18 SHRI KAILASH GARG INDORE / VS. ADIT(INVESTIGATION) INDORE ( APPELLANT ) ( REVENUE ) P.A. NO. AB OPG8730A APPELLANT BY WRITTEN SUBMISSION REVENUE BY SHRI P.K. SINGI , SR. DR DATE OF HEARING: 24.11.2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 24.11.2020 / O R D E R PER BENCH: THESE APPEALS ARE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(APPEALS)-3, BHOPAL DATED 31.05.2018 FOR ALL THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18. ANAND BANGUR & OTHERS 3 2. WHEN THESE APPEALS WERE TAKEN UP FOR HEARING, WE FOUND THAT THE WRITTEN APPLICATIONS FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEALS WERE FILED BY THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE REQUESTING THAT ASSESS EES MAY BE PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS AS ASSESSEES HAD OPTED VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME AND THE REQUISITE FORM NO.3 HAS BEE N ISSUED. 3. THE LD. D.R. HAS NOT RAISED ANY OBJECTION. 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THESE APPEALS ARE DISMISS ED AS WITHDRAWN. HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEES ARE AT LIBERTY TO FILE MISC. APPLICATIONS WITHIN THE SPECIFIED PERIOD AS PER LAW, IF THEY ARE NOT ISSUED THE REQUISITE FORM NO.5 BY THE REVENUE. 5. IN THE RESULT, THESE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESS EE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 24.11.20 20. SD/- (MANISH BORAD) SD/- (KUL BHARAT) A CCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER INDORE; DATED : 24 /11/2020 PATEL/PS COPY TO: ASSESSEE/AO/PR. CIT/ CIT (A)/ITAT (DR)/GUAR D FILE. BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, INDORE