IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A, BENC H MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY ARORA, AM & SHRI PAWAN SIN GH, JM ITA NO.6648/MUM/201 3 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009 -10) ITO-25(3)(3), ROOM NO. 304, 3 RD FLOOR, BUILDING NO. C-11, PRATYAKSHAKAR BHAVAN, B.K.C, BANDRA(EAST), MUMBAI-400051 VS. SHRI AMRUTLAL V. CHHEDA, C-201, DHEERAJ RESIDENCY, OPP SANSKRUTI BHAVAN, M.G. ROAD, KANDIVALI (W), MUMBAI-400067 PAN/G IR NO.: AAAPC8489M ( APPELLANT ) .. ( RESPONDENT ) APPELLANT BY : SHRI B.D. NAIK (DR) RESPONDENT BY : SHRI BHUPENDRA SHAH DATE OF HEARING : 18/05/2016 DATE OF ORDER : 18/05/2016 O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH, JM: THE ABOVE APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER (AO) RAISING ONLY ONE GROUND OF APPEAL FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR MENTIONED ABOVE. THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THE ABOVE REFERRED CASE IS BELOW THE MONETARY LIMIT (RS. 10,0 0,000/-) PRESCRIBED BY THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECTOR TAXES(CBDT), VIDE ITS CIRCULAR NO .21/2015(F.NO.142/2007-ITJ (PT.) DATED 10 TH DECEMBER, 2015. 2. SHRI BHUPENDRA SHAH APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE AS SESSEE. THE DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (DR) ON A QUERY BY THE BENCH FAIRLY CONCEDED THAT THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THE ABOVE CASE WAS LESS THAN RS. 10.00 LACS. CONSIDERING THESE FACTS, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL HOLDING THEM AS NOT MAINTAINABLE U/S. 268A OF THE ACT. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 18/05 /2016. SD/- SD/- (SANJAY ARORA) (PAWAN SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI; DATED : 18/05/2016 SK, PS COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ( ) / THE CIT(A), MUMBAI. 4. / CIT ITA NO.6648/M/13 2 / BY ORDER, / ( ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI 5. , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. / GUARD FILE. //TRUE COPY/