Shimla Ice Skating Club, Shimla V. ITO (Exemptions Ward), Solan

ITA 671/CHANDI/2022

AI Insights

The case involves an appeal by the Shimla Ice Skating Club against an order from the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi, dated 30/08/2022, for the Assessment Year 2018-19. During the hearing, no representative appeared on behalf of the assessee; however, a withdrawal application was submitted. The Senior Departmental Representative (Sr. DR) did not object to the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn. Consequently, the tribunal dismissed the appeal without further proceedings.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 127570 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 month(s) 2 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 02-04-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: Not Allotted
• Next Hearing Date: 02-04-2023
• Assessment Year: 2018-2019
• Appeal Filed On: 30-10-2022
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

आयकर अपील य अ धकरण,च डीगढ़ यायपीठ “एस.एम.सी” , च डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCHES, “SMC” CHANDIGARH ी व म संह यादव, लेखा सद%य BEFORE: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM ITA No. 671/Chd/2022 Assessment Year : 2018-19 Shimla Ice Skating Club Lakkar Bazar, Cart Road, Shimla(H.P.)-171001 The ITO (Exemption Ward) Solan PAN NO: AACTS5468G Appellant Respondent ! " Assessee by : None(Withdrawal Application) # ! " Revenue by : Smt. Amanpreet Kaur, JCIT, Sr. DR for Shri Akashdeep, JCIT, Sr. DR $ % ! & Date of Hearing : 03/04/2023 '()* ! & Date of Pronouncement : 03/04/2023 आदेश/Order PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM This is an appeal by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi dt. 30/08/2022 pertaining to A.Y. 2018-19. 2. During the course of hearing nobody was present on behalf of the assessee however withdrawal application has been furnished which read as under: Sub: Shimla Ice Skating Club., Lakkar Bazaar, Shimla (H.P) PAN: AACTS 5468G In Appeal No. ITA 671/CHANDI/2022 Ass. Years: 2018-19 Sir, I have been directed by my above noted client to withdraw the above said appeal filed by the assessee. Thanking you, Yours sincerely, Sd/- (CA, Dinesh Kumar Sood) 2 3. Ld. Sr. DR did not object if the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In view of the above the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. In the result, appeal of the Assessee is dismissed. (Order pronounced in the open Court on 03/04/2023 ) Sd/- व म संह यादव (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) लेखा सद%य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AG Date: 03/04/2023 ( + ! , - . - Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. $ / CIT 4. - 0 ग 2 3 & 2 3 456 ग7 DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 5. ग 6 8 % Guard File