IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F, NEW DELHI BEFORE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER DR. B. R. R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) ITA NO. 6776/DEL/2017 : ASSTT. YEAR : 2013-14 ACIT(E), CIRCLE-2(1), NEW DELHI VS YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF DELHI, ASHOKA ROAD, NEW DELHI-110001 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN NO. A AATY0027H ASSESSEE BY : SH. A. T. PANDA, ADV. REVENUE BY : NONE DATE OF HEAR ING: 1 7 . 06 .20 2 1 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 29 .06 .20 2 1 ORDER PER DR. B. R. R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE REVENUE A GAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-40, NEW DELHI DATED 23. 08.2017. 2. FOLLOWING GROUNDS HAVE BEEN RAISED BY THE REVENU E: 1. ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN LAW, THE LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN IGNORING THE FACT THAT THE RECEIPT OF BLUE TRIANGLE FAMILY HOSTEL BTF H IS IN NATURE OF BUSINESS/COMMERCE AND FALLS UNDER ADVANCEMENT OF ANY OTHER OBJECT OF GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITY WHICH HITS THE PROVISO OF SECTION 2(15) OF IT ACT. 3. THE MOOT POINT INVOLVED IN THE APPEAL IS THAT TH E AO HELD THAT THE RECEIPT OF THE HOSTEL FEES OF THE TRUST IS IN THE NATURE OF BUSINESS AND COMMERCE, WHEREAS THE LD. CIT (A) HELD THAT THE ITA NO. 6776/DEL/2017 YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF DELHI 2 SURPLUS RECEIPTS ARE BEING USED FOR THE CHARITABLE PURPOSE AND HENCE CALLS FOR NO INTERFERENCE FOR GRANT OF EXEMPT ION U/S 11. THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT (A) WAS BASED ON THE ORDER S OF THE REVENUE FOR THE EARLIER ASSESSMENT YEARS 2010-11, 2 011-12 AND 2012-13. THE ISSUE HAS BEEN ALREADY EXAMINED BY TH E TRIBUNAL AND HELD THAT THE SURPLUS RECEIPTS FROM THE HOSTEL ARE USED FOR ADVANCEMENT OF ANY OTHER OBJECT OF GENERAL PUBLIC U TILITY. 4. THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN ADJUDICATED BY THE CO-ORDINA TE BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE IN ITA NO. 2760/DEL/2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13 VIDE ORDER DATED 16.02.2021 WHEREIN THE TRIBUNAL OBSERVED AS U NDER: 1. ORDER OF LD. CIT (A) DATED 28.08.2016 FOR THE A.YS. 2010-11 & 2011-12. 2. ORDER OF ITAT DATED 15.02.2016 IN ITA NO.1019/DEL/2 013 FOR THE A.Y. 2009-10. 3. ORDER OF ITAT DATED 07.11.2017 IN ITA NO.5202/DEL/2 016 FOR THE A.Y. 2010-11. 4. ORDER OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT DATED 02.08.2016 IN ITA NO.509/2016 FOR THE A.Y. 2009-10 3. WE HAVE PERUSED THE ORDER OF THE HONBLE HIGH CO URT WHEREIN THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE HAS BEEN DISMISSED BY THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT REFERRING TO THE DECISION OF THE COURT IN THE CASE OF DELHI MUSIC SOCIETY VS DGIT 357 ITR 265 WHE REIN IT WAS HELD THAT THE ASSESSEE IS A CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION AND THE RECEIPTS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE ELIGIBLE FOR EXEMPTION. 4. KEEPING IN VIEW THE FACT THAT THE LD. CIT (A) HA S RIGHTLY DELETED THE ADDITION BASED ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE J URISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT, WE HEREBY DECLINE TO INTERFERE WITH THE ORDE R OF THE LD. CIT (A). ITA NO. 6776/DEL/2017 YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF DELHI 3 5. NO MATERIAL DIFFERENCE IN THE FACTS OF THE CASE OR IN THE PROPOSITION OF THE LAW HAVE BEEN BROUGHT BEFORE US BY EITHER OF THE PARTIES. KEEPING IN VIEW THE FACT THAT THE LD. CIT (A) HAS RIGHTLY DELETED THE ADDITION BASED ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT, WE HEREBY DECLIN E TO INTERFERE WITH THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT (A). 6. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 29/06/2021. SD/- SD/- (SUCHITRA KAMBLE) (DR. B. R. R. KUMAR) JUDICIAL MEMBER AC COUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 29/06/2021 *SUBODH* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR