SHRI UMA SHANKAR KHANDELWAL, Jaipur V. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

ITA 686/JPR/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9477 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 10 month(s) 6 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 15-03-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2015-2016
• Appeal Filed On: 09-05-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ROONI PAUL

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES A, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 686/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2015-16 SHRI UMA SHANKAR KHANDELWAL, 14, SUNDAR NAGAR, GIRDHAR MARG, JLN MARG, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. D.C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AHQPK 2701 B VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY: SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (CA) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SMT. ROONI PAUL(ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 12/03/2021 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 15/03/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-IV, JAIPUR DATED 26/04/2019 FOR THE A.Y. 2015-16. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION MADE IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: KINDLY REFER TO THE CAPTIONED APPEAL FIXED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE HONBLE BENCH ON 12/03/2021. ITA 686/JP/2019_ UMA SHANKAR KHANDELWAL VS DCIT 2 IN THE MATTER, IT IS SUBMITTED THAT FORM 3 IS ISSUED BY THE CIT IN RESPONSE TO APPLICADTION IN FORM 1 & 2 UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME BY THE ASSESSEE, COPY OF FORM 3 ENCLOSED. IT IS THEREFORE, HUMBLY REQUESTED TO PLEASE ALLOW THE APPELLANT TO WITHDRAW THE PRESENT APPEAL. INCONVENIENCE CAUSED IS EXTREMELY REGRETTED. THANKING YOU, YOURS FAITHFULLY, (MANISH AGARWAL) A/R 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15 TH MARCH, 2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 15/03/2021 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: ITA 686/JP/2019_ UMA SHANKAR KHANDELWAL VS DCIT 3 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SHRI UMA SHANKAR KHANDELWAL, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE D.C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 686/JP/2019) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR