Smt Bandana Chadha, Moradabad V. DCIT, New Delhi

ITA 687/DEL/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 112 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6928 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 23 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-03-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC 1
• Next Hearing Date: 13-07-2016
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 08-02-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SANJAY GOYAL

Judgement Text

PAGE 1 OF 3 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH A: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NOS. 686 TO 690/DEL/2016 A.YRS.: 2007-08 TO 2011-12 BANDANA CHADHA VS. DCIT, CC-29, 455, CIVIL LINES, NEW DELHI MORADABAD 244001 ARA CENTRE ( PAN: ACKPC9640A) JHANDEWALAN (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY : SH. SANJAY GOYAL, CIT(DR) O R D E R PER BENCH THESE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGA INST THE RESPECTIVE ORDERS OF THE LD. CIT(A)-30, NEW DELHI PERT AINING TO ASSESSMENT YEARS 2007-08 TO 2011-12. 2. IN THIS CASES THE NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE ASSESS EE FOR HEARING FOR TODAY I.E. 05.03.2019 AT THE ADDRESS MENTIONED I N FORM NO. 36 VIDE COLUMN NO. 10. 3. ON 05.03.2019, NEITHER THE ASSESSEE NOR HER AUTHORI SED REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDED THE HEARING AND ALSO NOT FILE D ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT OR NOR FILED THE FRESH ADDRESS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, HENCE, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT NO USEFUL PURPOSE WO ULD BE SERVED TO SERVE THE NOTICE AGAIN AND AGAIN ON THE SAME ADDRESS . IN VIEW OF ABOVE, IT IS THUS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF HER APPEALS. 4. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FOL LOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING T HAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. : 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) AND HONBLE MADHYA PRAD ESH HIGH PAGE 2 OF 3 COURTS DECSION IN ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE TREAT THESE APPEALS AS UNADMITTED AND DI SMISS THE SAME. WE WOULD LIKE TO CLARIFY THAT SUBSEQUENTLY I F THE ASSESSEE EXPLAINS THE REASONS FOR NON APPEARANCE AND IF THE BE NCH IS SO SATISFIED, THE MATTER MAY BE RECALLED FOR THE PURPOSE O F ADJUDICATION OF THE APPEALS. 5. IN THE RESULT, ALL THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE A RE DISMISSED IN LIMINE. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 01-03-2019. SD/- SD/- [O.P. KANT] [H.S. SIDHU] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATE:01/03/2019 SRBHATNAGAR COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4.CIT (A) 5. DR , ITAT TRUE COPY BY ORDER, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, DELHI BENCHES PAGE 3 OF 3