VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES SMC, JAIPUR JH IH-DS-CALY] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI P.K. BANSAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 687, 688 & 689/JP/2013 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09 & 2009-10 STATE BANK OF INDIA, SINDHI COLONY, BANI PARK, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (TDS)-1, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ L A-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AAACS 58577 K VIHYKFKHZ @ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ @ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (CA) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SHRI O.P. BHATEJA (ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 05/11/2015 MN?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[ K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 06/11/2015 VKNS'K @ ORDER PER P.K. BANSAL, A.M. ALL THESE APPEALS HAVE BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE/ STATE BANK OF INDIA AGAINST THE ORDERS DATED 14/05/2013 PASSED BY THE LD CIT(A)-III, JAIPUR FOR A.Y. 2008-09 & 2009-10. 2. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE LD AR OF THE A SSESSEE SOUGHT PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSES SEE, FOR WHICH, THE ITA 687, 688 & 689/JP/2013_ STATE BANK OF INDIA VS ITO(TDS) 2 LD DR HAS NOT RAISED ANY OBJECTION. THEREFORE, I ALL OW THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THEIR APPEALS. 4. IN THE RESULT, ALL THE THREE APPEALS FILED BY TH E ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 06/11/2015. SD/- IH-DS-CALY (P.K. BANSAL) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ @ JAIPUR FNUKAD @ DATED:- 06 TH NOVEMBER, 2015 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- STATE BANK OF INDIA, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE ITO (TDS)-1, JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 687, 688 & 689/JP/2013) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR