Webtech Engineering P. Ltd., Faridabad V. ITO, TDS, Faridabad

ITA 689/DEL/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 104 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6863 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 10 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 06-12-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 29-01-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ANIL GANDHI
• Section: 234B

Judgement Text

1 ITA No. 689/Del/2018 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI R.K.PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A No. 689/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2013-14) M/s. Webtech Engineering P. Ltd. Plot No. 20, Sector 25, Faridabad, PAN : AAACW3176E Vs The Assessing Officer Central Circle-I, Faridabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By None Respondent by Shri Anil Gandhi, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 06.12.2021 Date of Pronouncement 07.12.2021 Hearing conducted via Webex ORDER PER DIVA SINGH, J.M. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee wherein the correctness of the order dated 30 th November, 2017 of CIT(A), Faridabad is assailed on the following grounds : “1. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in upholding the action of the Ld. AO in making addition of Rs. 5,75,560/- allegedly onnaccount of penalty 221(1). 2. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in upholding the action of the Ld. AO in levying penalty @ 20% after being satisfied with serious cash crunch in the company. 2 ITA No. 689/Del/2018 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in upholding the action of the Ld. AO charging interest u/s 234A and 234B of the income Tax Act, 1961. 4. That the appellant craves the leave to add, amend, modify, delete any of the grounds of appeal before or at the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without prejudice to each other.” 2. However, No one was present on behalf of the assessee despite issuance of notice. The record further shows that on the earlier date i.e. 5 th October, 2021 also the assessee remained un-represented. On 11 th August, 2021 it is seen that the appeal was adjourned on the written request of the assessee. Despite these facts, it is noticed that the following Defects pointed out by the Registry in the filing of the present appeal on 23 rd April, 2018 remain unaddressed : “1. Appeal Fee is short by Rs. 500. 2. Tribunal fee Challan not filed. 3. Original form 36 not filed in triplicate.” 3. Thus, it is seen that since the assessee has not even cared to cure the defects despite issuance of notice and putting in an appearance also it appears that the assessee may not be serious in pursuing the appeal filed. In the face of the continued defects pointed out by the Registry, the appeal is dismissed as defective. Liberty is given to the assessee to pray for a recall of this order by giving an undertaking that the assessee shall cure the defects and is ready to argue the appeal on merits. 4. Accordingly for the reasons hereinabove in terms of the directions given the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as defective. Said order was pronounced in the open court via Webex at the time of hearing itself. 3 ITA No. 689/Del/2018 5. In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as defective. Order pronounced in the Open Court on this 07 Day of December, 2021 in presence of both the parties. Sd/- Sd/- (R.K.PANDA) (DIVA SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER * Bintia* Copy to 1. The appellant 2. The respondent 3. CIT(A) concerned 4. CIT concerned 5. D.R. ITAT concerned Bench, Delhi 6. Guard File. // BY Order // Assistant Registrar, ITAT Delhi Benches: Delhi.