SHRI BOMMU VENKATESWARA RAO, KOTA V. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTA

ITA 692/JPR/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 125 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6322 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 10 month(s) 9 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 18-07-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 08-09-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: PUNAM RAI

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH FOT; IKY JKO] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH HKKXPAN] YS[KK L NL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI BHAGCHAND, A M VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 692& 693/JP/2017 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11& 2012-13 SHRI B. VENKATESWARA RAO OQH-3 JAYKAY NAGAR, KOTA. CUKE VS. THE DCIT, CIRCLE - 2, KOTA. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: ABOPR 7205 B VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SMT. PUNAM RAI (DCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 18/07/2018 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 18/07/2018 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: VIJAY PAL RAO, J.M. THESE APPEALS BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGAINST TWO SEPARATE ORDERS OF LD. CIT(A), KOTA DATED 13.06.2017 AND 14 .06.2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2010-11 & 2012-13 RESPECTIVELY. 2. NONE HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN THIS APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING. IT TRANSPIRES FROM THE RECO RD THAT ON THE LAST DATE OF HEARING THE ASSESSEE TOOK ADJOURNMENT AND L D. AR HAS DULY NOTED DOWN THE DATE OF HEARING. DESPITE THE DATE OF HEARING DULY NOTED IT A NO.692&693/JP/2017 SHRI B. VENKATESWARA RAO VS. DCIT 2 DOWN BY THE LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE, NONE HAS APPEAR ED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN F ILED. THUS, IT IS APPARENT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PRO SECUTION OF THE PRESENT APPEAL. 3. THEREFORE, IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE D ECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDI A (P) LTD., [1991] 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE M.P . HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT [ 1997] 223 ITR 480, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS NOT ADMITTED AND IS D ISMISSED IN LIMINE FOR NON PROSECUTION AS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 18/07/2018. SD/- SD/- HKKXPAN FOT; IKY JKO (BHAGCHAND) (VIJAY PAL RAO) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 18/07/2018. * SANTOSH. VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SHRI B. VENKATESWARA RAO, KOTA. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- DCIT, CIRCLE-2, KOTA. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO. 692 &693/JP/2017} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR