E IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL E BENCH, MUMBAI .. , !'# $ $ $ $ ! %, & !'# !' BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, AM AND SHRI SANJAY GARG, J M !./ I.T.A. NO. 6995 /MUM/2011 ( &) % $*% &) % $*% &) % $*% &) % $*% / / / / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2005-06) MR. SAMIR M. CHINAI, C/O PIRAMAL SONS PVT. LTD., IST FLOOR, ARMY & NAVY BUILDING, M.G. ROAD, KALAGHODA, MUMBAI 400 001. ) ) ) ) / VS. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 15 & 16, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MUMBAI 400 020. #+ !./ PAN : AAAPC6843R ( +, / // / APPELLANT ) .. ( -.+, / RESPONDENT ) +, / 0 ! / APPELLANT BY : SHRI ARVIND DALAL -.+, / 0 ! / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI GIRIJA DAYAL !)$ / / // / DATE OF HEARING : 06-08-2013 12* / / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 06-08-2013 '3 / O R D E R PER P.M. JAGTAP, A.M . : .. THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A) 39, MUMBAI DTD. 15-07-2011. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING BEFORE US, THE ASSESSEE H AS MOVED AN APPLICATION SEEKING PERMISSION OF THE BENCH TO WITHDRAW HIS APP EAL FILED BEFORE THE ITA 6995/MUM/2011 2 TRIBUNAL. SINCE THE LD. D.R. HAS ALSO NO OBJECTION FOR GIVING SUCH PERMISSION, WE GRANT THE PERMISSION AS SOUGHT BY THE ASSESSEE A ND DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMI SSED. 4 5 &) %4 / 4 / 67 ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 6-8-2013. . '3 / 12* 8')5 6-8-2013 2 / SD/- SD/- (SANJAY GARG) (P.M. JAGTAP ) & !'# JUDICIAL MEMBER !'# / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI ; 8') DATED 6-8-2013 $.&).!./ RK , SR. PS '3 / -&9: ;:* '3 / -&9: ;:* '3 / -&9: ;:* '3 / -&9: ;:*/ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. +, / THE APPELLANT 2. -.+, / THE RESPONDENT. 3. < () / THE CIT(A)- 39, MUMBAI 4. < / CIT CENTRAL -II, MUMBAI 5. :$? -&&) , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI E BENCH 6. @% A / GUARD FILE. '3)! '3)! '3)! '3)! / BY ORDER, !.: -& //TRUE COPY// B B B B/ // /!6 !6 !6 !6 ( DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , , , , / ITAT, MUMBAI