IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD C BENCH AHMADABAD , , , , BEFORE SHRI MUKUL KR. SHRAWAT , JUDICIAL MEMBER AND , SHRI T.R. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER .. , ! ! ! ! ITA NO. 7/AHD/2011 ASSESSMENT YEAR :2006-07 AIMS INDUSTRIES LTD. BESIDES GEB SUB-STATION, AT & PO GAVASAD PADRA-JAMBUSAR RD., B ARODA V/S . DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), BARODA PAN NO. A A CCA3 233C (APPELLANT) .. (RESPONDENT) '# $ % / BY APPELLANT NONE &''# $ % /BY RESPONDENT SHRI J. P. JHANGID, SR. D.R. () $ /DATE OF HEARING 10.03.2014 *+, $ /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 27.03.2014 O R D E R PER : T.R.MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THIS IS AN APPEAL AT THE BEHEST OF THE ASSESSEE WH ICH HAS EMANATED FROM THE ORDER OF CIT(A)-I, BARODA, DATED 18.10.201 0 FOR A.Y. 2006-07. THE ASSESSMENT WAS FRAMED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INC OME-TAX, CIRCLE-12(1), BARODA, U/S. 143(3) OF THE I.T. ACT, 1961 FOR THE A SSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07. 2. AT THE OUT SET, IT IS SEEN FROM THE RECORDS THAT NOTICE HAS BEEN ISSUED TO THE ASSESSEE ON 29.01.2014 HOWEVER, ON THE DATE OF HEARING I.E. 10.03.2014, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR FILED A NY ADJOURNMENT PETITION. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN P ROSECUTING THIS APPEAL. ITA NO. 7/AHD/2011 A.Y.2006-07 AIMS INDUSTRIES LTD. VS. DCIT PAGE 2 3. IN VIEW OF THESE FACTS, IT IS CLEAR THAT THE ASS ESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF THIS APPEAL AND ACCORDINGLY, FOLLOWI NG THE DECISION OF THE MULTIPLAN (INDIA) (P) LTD., (38 ITD 320), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR NON- PROSECUTION. THIS ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 27.03.2014 SD/- SD/- ( MUKUL KR. SHRAWAT) (T.R. MEENA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TRUE COPY S.K.SINHA - - - - $ $$ $ &. &. &. &. /., /., /., /., / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. '# / APPELLANT 2. &''# / RESPONDENT 3. 33 4 / CONCERNED CIT 4. 4- / CIT (A) 5. .89 &( , , / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. 9;< => / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER/ - , ?/ 3A , !